Should Heroes Be Defined as People Who Say What They Think When We Ourselves Lack the Courage to Say It?

401 Words2 Pages
Should heroes be defined as people who say what they think when we ourselves lack the courage to say it? The question about whether heroes should be depicted as people who say what they think when others lack the courage to say it has triggered an intense controversy throughout the world. Admittedly, the majority of people are content to go through their life following the crowd. Thus, from my perspective, the genuinely heroes are those who hold their dauntless courage to strive for morality and follow their hearts when the public is full of cowards. A true Indian hero, Mahatma Gandhi voiced his opinions about non-violent means of achieving freedom when others lacked the courage to express similar ideas. The intrepid old man used non-violent resilience to drive away the British from his country. As the political and spiritual leader of the Indian independence movement, he stood for the Indian citizens when the latter lacked the courage to stand for themselves. He believed that his country should get freedom and so did other Indians. He attend the London conference on India as the sole representative of the Indian National Congress while other representatives lack his persevering courage. His life explicitly edifies how a person stood for what he thought was right when other people lacked the courage to do so. In addition, from another historical example is Martin Luther King, a hero who spoke for African Americans’ rights when others were too cowardly to do so. In his short life, Martin Luther King was instrumental in helping the public realize and rectify those unspeakable flaws which were tarnishing the name of America. In those days, American Blacks were confined to the position of second class citizenship by restrictive laws and customs. In order to break these laws, Martin Luther King was the sole person who provided a candle along with a light among
Open Document