Just thinking about the skinning of an animal terrifies me, but it saddens me more to know that there are people in the world that can kill animals just for the profit that it can bring to them. When an animal is captured, it is put through unbelievable pain. It sometimes drives the animal to tear through its own flesh and bone, sometimes the animal even loose teeth because they bite on the trap. Sometimes the animals are left suffering for hours before the hunters show up to kill the animal by stumping on the animal. This type of animal cruelty is legal for people with a license to hunt, but for those who are not legalized hunters can face many years in prison and be fined thousands of dollars.
Besides, in zoos, it is almost impossible to meet the animals’ natural needs. Another argument for keeping animals in zoos is that people learn something new about these animals. Actually, zoos do not teach us much because animals do not act the way they would in the wild. I think we can learn more about animals by watching wildlife programs on TV. In conclusion, I would argue that zoos do not seem to help endangered species and keeping animals behind bars only for the sake of our entertainment is not quite fair.
The animals will be tortured either way, so one person not eating meat will not save enough lives to make a difference. This excuse is countered with the argument that if everybody who thought that they couldn’t
Should animals be used for Entertainment? Animals should not be used for entertainment. With animals, there is no such thing as "positive reinforcement." Animals don’t ride bicycles, stand on their heads, or jump through rings of fire just voluntarily or out of kindness. The performance of animals depends on how much they are tormented, punished and deprived.
It may not do any harm, but on the other hand, it may.” This shows the dangerous factor of the food. This can relate back to Frankenstein, for he doesn’t want to create another monster because of the harm it could do or not do. He doesn’t want to take that chance of a mistake again. This relates back to the theme of the dangerous curiosity if knowledge. In the second article, Fox News states that they wont know the effect it will have on the animals and society, “…many individuals have qualms about
Those who say the sport is cruel stubbornly argue that the sport is unkind because a horse may be in pain for three minutes before a professional vet euthinises the injured horse. The short term suffering a horse perhaps endures during a controlled event is traumatic but the pain suffered is short lived. Without the sport the horse would suffer dearly. While this may seem somewhat cruel that a horse is euthinised within only three minutes, can be other horses injured and unsupervised for a week in a paddock. According to Wise Geek.
Individual have diverse feelings for animals. Sorrowfully animal lovers cannot fight for their side, yet they still combat to save animal lives. Animals used as their companions while others view that animals are for scientific survey course only. Several scientists only think how to making their test flourish without knowing that animal they use are being abused and maltreated. Not all tests are relevant to human health.
>In order to help you better understand the importance of why wild animals do not make good pets, I will explain how you can't take the “wild” out of wild animals, the dangers of having them, and share stories of why it doesn't work. >>First, I will explain why you can't take the “wild” out of wild animals. >According to Webster's dictionary.com >A wild animals is defined as an animal living in a state of nature; not tamed or domesticated. >Wild animals aren't domesticated simply by being captive born or hand-raised. It's a different story with cats and dogs, who have been domesticated by selective breeding for desired traits for over thousands of years.
They believe that animals should be granted the right against suffering at the hands of humans. I believe that it is wrong to think that animals have any rights. To protect animals from suffering by humans should be a matter of animal welfare, not right. According to Jussen, animal rights proposes that it is unacceptable to use animals for any human purpose at all, including the use of dogs and cats as pets, cows and pigs for food, or the use of animals in research and testing. Regardless of how humane, animal rights proponents reject all animal use as exploitation and aim to ban all use of animals by humans.
Since animals cannot speak and tell us that they do not want to perform every night in the circus, we need to speak for them and say this is not okay to do. The second reason I agree with Michaela is no animal should be deprived of everyday necessities such as, water, food, and rest. In my opinion, this type of training is inhumane and cruel. This type of training would never be okay in the human world, so why is it okay to do with animals? If you were not performing your job to your supervisor’s satisfaction, you would not have your food, drink, or house taken away from you.