Sharp And Cartwright: The Spread Of Genocide

863 Words4 Pages
The Spread Of Genocide Racism has conflicted many countries with catastrophic tragedies. Overtime, genocide became the given title for racial, religious, and ethnic destruction. After the Jewish Holocaust of World War II, many countries pledged to a new world without genocide; however, many recent conflicts in different countries show us that the pledge against genocide has failed. The consequences of inaction and indifference has decimated a large population of ethnic groups like the Jewish population during the Holocaust; moreover, the value of acting out against oppression and tyranny can prevent violence and evince human morality. The consequences of inaction has decimated ethnic minorities, but how did these consequences affect ethnic groups? The consequences of inaction has influenced the spread of genocide. As Dustin N. Sharp and Derrick R. Cartwright, the authors of “The…show more content…
2). In other words, Sharp and Cartwright believe that even though many people were aware that something catastrophic was occurring, they still did nothing to prevent it; moreover, the acts of “nothing” has given a greater advantage towards the spread of genocide. Sharp and Cartwright’s theory that the spread of genocide is due to inaction is extremely useful because it shreds insight into the difficult problem of the genocide dissemination. Similar to Sharp and Cartwright’s theory, Elie Wiesel, a concentration camp prisoner from the Holocaust of World War II, mentions his memories in Buna, a concentration camp where he was imprisoned with his father; moreover, he notes that several times within a

More about Sharp And Cartwright: The Spread Of Genocide

Open Document