Harrison Friday Mr. Lamb 1/25/09 English 11 Honors Hamlet, in regards to the consistency of the character Hamlet is not nessicaily a flawed one but just an overly complicated one. There are so many drives and emotions pushing him in different direction that he eventually becomes misunderstood. Luckily with a large amount of thinking on the perplexing motives of Hamlet, one can certainly figure out that Hamlet character is a constant one, changing only in small and necessary ways. Hamlet, in most respects is just a product of his environment, contrary to the popular belief of Hamlet being a product of a poor character development. According to many writers and scholars Hamlet changes from a slightly melancholy character into a gloomy depressed character.
There is also Dr Lanyon, who is seen to be completely opposed to the science of Jekyll but loses his Victorian values to his curiosity when Jekyll reveals his secret. The contrast of “Henry Jekyll’s Full Statement of the Case” to the narrative of Mr Utterson in the other chapters of this book shows duality because Mr Utterson uses the other characters as a point of view whereas Jekyll’s statement of the case looks from only his perspective. Stevenson uses the lasting moral message that good and evil are conflicting inside people - the way that savagery and civilisation contrast and our effects on religion and science. Robert Louis Stevenson uses the character of Sir Danvers Carew to portray that civilisation and religion are important for good people whereas Mr Hyde shows evil through his curiosity of life and his height to represent youth, showing that Jekyll’s youthful sins; which were not explained in detail are replicated as Hyde. This is a comment on Victorian values that Stevenson is making.
It is a technological dominance on a higher level. There is no individuality in the Brave New World, but an illusion individuality that is instilled with the unreal world. Yet, in the both worlds the struggle of the individual against technology is evident. In Brave New World, John was 'abducted' from a world of individuality into the perfect world of Bernard's and Lenina's collectivity. John looks at both worlds through the lenses of the religion he got from the Reservation-a mixture of Christianity and American Indian beliefs - and the old-fashioned morality he learned from reading Shakespeare.
The theme of disruption refers to the unbalancing of what is natural, a theme which is explored and opinionated in Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein (1817) and Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (Director’s cut), where ‘disruptive’ actions of individuals, involving the exploitation of nature, bring about [ironically] the character’s own downfall, and more importantly, an undesired outcome whilst playing god. The critical theme outlined in both texts is humanity’s desire for power which leads to the rejection of our natural world, and this, by extension, means turning to technology and other unconventional methods in order to gain knowledge and distinction. Shelley specifically cautions against scientific advancement and the obsession which follows
Bre’Anna Walker Humanism in Shakespeare’s Works Is it immoral that some people reject that there’s a being out there superior to human life; that controls it all and believes that we alone are in control and have free will? Does it mean that they, themselves are corrupt and wicked? These humanist people may be religious, and some of them even believe in God. Humanism is a belief or action that leans toward the concept that humans are superior to any other being; therefore, making human welfares, ideals, and self-worth predominant. William Shakespeare was a humanist himself, and he made that known in his sonnets and plays.
The two things are identical. If they are, moral words collapse; if good equates with evil, then neither good (“fair”) nor evil (“foul) has any meaning at all. The ambiguous nature of moral values and indistinguishableness between fair and foul generates an atmosphere of confusion, and subsequently, dramatic tension of uncertainty in the play. This dramatic perplexity is sustained by the characters throughout the play, such as the moment when Macbeth describes the day in Act 1 Scene 3: “So foul and fair a day I have not
In William Shakespeare’s ‘Macbeth’, there were numerous factors that accumulated to lead up to the tragedies that occurred. The Weird Sisters were not catalysts for these tragedies, as they only acted as a mirror to reflect and reveal man’s true nature and flaws. A Shakespearean tragedy is when character flaws become so dominant that they lead up to a number of tragic events, and eventually the downfall of the characters themselves. This was demonstrated in the play when, after being foretold by the Weird Sisters that he would soon be King, Macbeth’s true nature began to surface. His desire for power eventually overpowered his morality and caused him to perform a series of violent murderous acts.
Lindsey Speights Dr. Obradovic World Literature ii 29 September 2015 Philosophy of Pangloss vs. Martin What readers should take from Voltaire’s work is to refrain from determining whether Pangloss is right or not. Whether good or bad triumphs, it doesn't do any good to constantly ponder over the matter. “Man was placed in the garden to work, not to be idle.” I believe that Candide no longer would argue, he just realized the purport less futility of doing it and that true ecstasy will be by living life without cerebrating. Pangloss was a philosopher who additionally transpired to be Candide’s mentor. He was the man responsible for a majority of quotes that made this text popular.
However, Holden Caulfield’s actions compare to the actions of the so-called “phonies” that he dislikes so much. One example is when he calls himself, “The most terrific liar you ever saw in your life” (Salinger 16). He contradicts his own views with his actions and through this contradictory trait that he withholds, Salinger makes a point that mankind is too blind to see the error in their ways. Holden’s hypocritical personality is seen on page 62 of the novel when Holden says, “Sometimes I can think of very crumby stuff I wouldn't mind doing if the opportunity came up. I can even see how it might be quite a lot of fun, in a crumby way, and if you were both sort of drunk and all, to get a girl and squirt water or something all over each other's face.
Transcendentalism is the idea that the truth transcends the senses. Writers like Whitman and Thoreau believed two of truths were the relationship with nature and becoming one’s own individual. Though in today’s society, these truths have become distant and irrelevant. The transcendental philosophy is based on the premise that truth is innate in all creation and that knowledge is “intuitive rather than rational”. Thoreau’s and Whitman’s writings were emanating individuality of one’s voice, the strength of having original character—that “imitation is suicide” (Emerson).