Analysis Of Antony And Cleopatra

1274 Words6 Pages
SHAKESPEAR'S ANTOY AND CLEOPATRA AND DRYDEN'S ALL FOR LOVE COMPARISON Antony and Cleopatra is a tragedy by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written sometime between 1603 and 1607. It follows the relationship between Cleopatra and Mark Antony from the time of the Parthian War to Cleopatra's suicide. The major antagonist is Octavius Caesar, one of Antony's fellow triumviri and the future first emperor of Rome. The tragedy is a Roman play characterized by swift, panoramic shifts in geographical locations and in registers, alternating between sensual, imaginative Alexandria and the more pragmatic, austere Rome. All for Love or, The World Well Lost, is a heroic drama by John Dryden written in 1677. Today, it is Dryden’s best-known and…show more content…
Obviously unable to take away from Shakespeare and his verse, Dryden makes up for his inferiority in verse in other ways. One example is his use of characters. While the reader is constantly checking back to find who's who in Antony and Cleopatra, Dryden has simplified his cast of characters allowing for smoother reading. While Dryden sticks with tradition and formulates his play within a 24-hour period, Shakespeare goes from place to place forcing the reader to constantly check the status of the situation. Shakespeare has more underlying themes in his verse such as the attack on the triumvirate, whereas Dryden focuses more on the love and drama of Antony and Cleopatra allowing the reader to be more involved in the drama instead of figuring out where the stories going next. While both texts ultimately speak of true love at its finest, the refinery of their characters is quite different. Dryden portrays an, although love stricken, heroic soldier never lacking in pride for his person, and on the other hand a love struck queen who is at the mercy of her brave hero. On the opposite end of the spectrum Shakespeare chooses the opposite route. His feminine lead is selfish and manipulative, although she ultimately loves Marc Antony, she is…show more content…
Antony is perceived as her type when you discover her past lovers being Caesar and Pompey the Great. All men are well known, powerful, and wealthy. All these characteristics fit Marc Antony. Cleopatra is constantly chastising him and selfish in her successions. From the very beginning when she says, "If it be love indeed, tell me how much" the reader can sense the upper hand she has over him. While one can presume her love for Antony is great, her woes when he returns to Octavia, one can also presume her love for herself is greater. Shakespeare expands on the idea of her killing herself not only as a painless sacrifice to her lover, but more so she will not be a prize to Caesar. The reader comes to this idea in Shakespeare more than in Dryden because the character of Cleopatra is harsher throughout Shakespeare's play allowing the reader to develop Cleopatra as a manipulative mind. In Dryden the reader is allotted more time to know Cleopatra. She is a humbled woman, weak in confidence and unable to survive without Antony. Although her character is not as manipulative than in Shakespeare, the reader is able to conceive a clearer idea of the love shared between the two. Dryden allows us to view Cleopatra more because she is with Antony. Unfortunately, we learn that she is weak without him. This is portrayed well when Octavia confronts her about
Open Document