Soaring rates of sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancies among these teens are adding urgency to the debate over sex education. Sex education in schools will lead to healthier sex behavior among the students in their later lives. II. Some conservatives claim the alarming statistics illustrate why abstinence should be the single topic when it comes to sexual education, others say it should not be part of the school curriculum. Liberals counter that the increase in disease is the strongest case for more detailed information.
Studies done by Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, prove that by age 16, 17% of girls and 29% of boys have had sexual intercourse. Using a contraceptive during sexual intercourse has been proven to protect against pregnancy and infections in the body. Distributing contraceptives in school will cause kids to become more sexually responsible and aware, lower teen pregnancy rates, and lower teen STDs rates also. Distribution of contraceptives teaches teens who are sexually active, and even those who are not, to have sex responsibly. Contraceptives are not that accessible to teens, so those who are sexually active are having unprotected sex.
Should sex education be taught in schools? There have been many debates over this. Studies show parents say that sex education only destroys the morality of people because they think that sex education teaches students about how sexual intercourse is done. Although sex education lowers the morality of people by teaching students how to use condoms and contraceptives, it should be taught in primary school and secondary school because its a prevents sexual diseases and teenage pregnancy, it is indeed a need in case of parents’ absence, and it gives children the idea of what is right and what is wrong. Research shows that teens are more sexually active now than before.
Running head: SEX EDUCATION FOR SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN 1 Sex Education for School Age Children There is an ongoing debate in America about funding sex education programs from state to state. The debate focuses on whether or not the sex education programs should be comprehensive, or if the programs should be a required course of study in middle school and high school. The debate is centered on the advantages of abstinence-only applications vs. more inclusive education programs that also educate the children about sexually transmitted diseases, birth control, and pregnancy. There is an abundant amount of data and research that shows the importance of funding sex education programs for middle and high school students. According to Sullivan-Anderson (2009), "We now have a pretty good sense of which sex-education approaches work."
Abbie Beck ENC 1101 Dickson November 20, 2008 Argument Essay The Birds and the Bees Is it more beneficial for children to be cognizant or imbecilic on the subject of sexual matters? This controversial issue is one that our country has been debating for many years, but recently, more people are beginning to become opinionated on the subject. Many adults believe that the education of sexual matters should be taught only at home. Perhaps society should be grateful that parents are even talking to their children about sexual matters, but parents are ordinarily biased when it comes to their own children. Without being educated on the subject by non-biased adults, then there is a chance that the children will not receive all the information they need to make mature decisions.
However, the word “pain” tells us that it is an agonizing, and confusing period for young people when they are trying to discover their sexuality, but the word does not criticize being homosexuals, it only states that it can be difficult. This implies that Bennett is aware of the homophobia that was and still is a serious issue in society, and that it is not always easy to come out as homosexual. Posner’s next line of speech after this is “I just wish there were marks for it”. This jokingly criticizes the exam focussed, functional education system, because this shows Posner’s obsession of doing well in exams. This criticism of exams
J. Sabia states in his article, Does sex education affect adolescent sexual behaviors and health, "Advocates of sex education argue that a teenager's decision to become sexually active is largely independent of school based sex education", while insisting that sex education is necessary to provide contraceptive information to teens so as to reduce the probability of unwanted pregnancy should they choose to engage in sexual intercourse (784). Ninety four percent of the districts involved in the study The Availability of Sex Education in Large City School Districts said that the main goal of their sex education programs were to " to promote rational and informed decision-making about sexuality." while the second most chosen goal was " to increase a student's knowledge of reproduction"(21). Research shows that the premise of sex education in schools is to inform and educate the adolescents rather than to promote promiscuity. A sexually active adolescent who has been educated with adequate information about the use of contraceptives such as
Credibility: know where audience is coming from, subject affects everyone Thesis & main points: Allowing students to learn about all aspects of sexual education, not just abstinence will help decrease the spread of STD’s, lower the teen pregnancy rate, and help promote healthy relationships. Transition # 1: The spread of STD’s has gotten way out of hand in America, mostly because no one ever really learns about them until it’s too late. Main point 1: Teaching students about each STD, ways to protect against them, and how to get tested if sexually active, can drastically curve there spread, not just for everyone now, but later on in life as well. Sub point 1: According to Women’s health.org, the United States has the highest rates of STDs in the industrialized world. In the United States alone, about 19 million new infections are estimated to occur each year.
Parents undermined that spanking is a form of abuse. This is not only physical abuse, but also mental abuse. What parent’s don’t realize is that spanking contradicts the values they try to instill on their children. Instead of using the method of spanking parents that cause damage to children, parents should really consider some alternative ways. Better and healthier ways of remanding a child is talk to them, and if that doesn’t work you can resort to punishing them.
When the parents spank the kids, they’re doing it out of caring and want to teach them a lesson so they can learn the consequences from their actions. According Professor Marjorie Gunnoe, “children spanked up to the age of 6 were likely as teenagers to perform better at school and were more likely to carry out volunteer work and to want to go to college than their peers who had never been physically disciplined”. Children who are been discipline by spanking since little will most likely will be doing better later on in life. People who spank their children want them to grow up to be respectable people instead of being a bad one. Children often make bad behavior and decision so there is no problem with spanking as long as it is used in moderate way to teach the kids how to be good and not as a way injures or abusing them.