Serial Killers: a Product of Nature or Nurture?

2468 Words10 Pages
Psychologists argue that there are no bad people, simply bad decisions made by good-natured people. But what about those who fall under abnormal psychology, who have differently wired brains that make them inclined to kill people for their own personal pleasure. Serial killers have become a big phenomena due to being popularized by media. So what makes a serial killer, and why are they so interesting? The most fascinating thing about serial killers themselves is that it is utterly impossible to completely understand them. As much as researchers try, there is no way to completely pinpoint the madness, only attempts at theories that can never quite explain them all. Every serial killer is a different case, and it is hard to classify them all together. With all the data gathered, there are different ways to categorize them but so far there is no evidence that supports whether it is nature or nurture that creates these sadistic human beings. Sometimes its both and sometimes it's one or the other. The nurture part itself offers comfort, because it gives the impression that humans are not ill-natured at heart, only become this way due to unfortunate circumstances. But for cases that support the nature factor, this leaves us to accept that there really does lie evil in some human beings. Serial killers and their crimes all fall under distinctive categories when it comes to the influencing factors, state of mind and focus. These factors interact with each other and help determine if they are a product of nature or nurture, but is there only one answer or do both these products continuously produce human beings that are drawn to such evil acts. So how does one attain a serial killer status? The former director of the FBI’s Violent Criminal Apprehension Program, Robert Ressler coined the term serial killer in the 1970’s. He chose to call them serial killers because serial

More about Serial Killers: a Product of Nature or Nurture?

Open Document