Synthesis Essay 2 “The most powerful question a parent can ask” by Neil Millar and “Be-ers and Doers” by Budge Wilson are about making children demonstrate great accountability. Neil Millar talks about “what kind of children do (we) want to raise” whereas Budge talks about the difference between being and doing. Both of the passages represent that being parents is a very challenging job but “the most powerful question a parent can ask “ shows the more respectful approach of parents to their children. In some families values play an important role. “(These) values pass on mother-to-mother combine with the natural instincts to love, support and nurture.” If a person was raised spending most of the time on the things that were being bad influence for them such as wrestling or teen’s reality show or their parents were too busy working and did not have enough time to check if they were keeping up with the homework and reading.
Stroufe (1983) found that securely attached infants tend to become popular and confident social leaders. This research shows that the types of attachment identified in the ‘Strange Situation’ have validity. The procedure was also repeated at a later date, producing similar results, so the method also has reliability. However, the ‘Strange Situation’ has been critised for many reasons such as; relationships rather than attachment may be what is being investigated, the ethics of the experiment are questionable as they induced anxiety in the caregivers and infants. Psychoanalyst John Bowlby is a pioneer into child psychology who closely followed the work of Freud.
EYMP 1 Task 2 3.1 As a trainee practitioner i need to show the knowledge and understanding of how partnership with parents is important to the success of each individual child in the setting. Promoting an effective bond between the parents and professionals, this provides a source of strength throughout their time in the setting. Consequently practitioners should be very aware that there leading role is very different in the Childs life, compared to their own parents, carers etc. Practitioners roll is to be able to show a more compassionate bond with the child. Leading on Carolyn Meggitt also believed that “Practitioners need to develop constant, warm and affectionate relationships with children, especially babies, but should not seek to
Parenting has long been recognized as making an important contribution to child development. A rich empirical history has documented how various parenting attitudes and practices influence child behavior and the development of either pro-social competencies or psychosocial maladjustment. Generally speaking, these studies have found that parenting practices that include the provision of positive reinforcement, open displays of warmth or affection, involvement in and active monitoring of children’s activities, and consistent but not overly harsh disciplinary strategies tend to relate to various measures of adaptive child psychosocial adjustment, including academic competence, high self-esteem, positive peer relations, and fewer child behavior problems”. Parenting practices’ objectives are to guarantee children’s wellbeing and security, preparing children for life as dynamic adults and conveying intellectual values. A premium parent-child correlation is significant for vigorous growth.
Sensitive parenting is the most important factor in a child’s psychological development – discuss This essay will explore the concept of sensitive parenting and will look at how the dynamic interactions between parent and child inform Attachment Theory a model which measures child development. This model, pioneered by Bowlby is posited within the principles of a psychoanalytic and biological perspective (Bee, H.L., 2000). Child attachment can be classified into two main types, secure and insecure, by using a standard laboratory assessment known as the “Strange Situation” developed by Ainsworth, insecure attachment was divided further into sub groups, ambivalent and avoidant (Ding, S. & Littleton, K. 2005). Whilst discussing attachment theory which utilises the concept of an internal working model other approaches in terms of understanding how parenting affects child development will be explored. Theoretical positions such as social learning theory which lies heavily on behaviourist principles will be looked at, parenting styles where patterns of parenting will be discussed and inter-generational transmission which serves to perpetuate society’s inequalities and disadvantages with negative connotations for a child’s psychological development (Ding, S. & Littleton, K. 2005).
Gender-Differentiated Parenting The burden of social science evidence supports the idea that gender differentiated parenting is important for human development and that the contribution of fathers to childrearing is unique and irreplaceable. A broad review of psychological research in the journal Child Development, for example, concluded that children of parents who are sextyped are more "competent. "18 And a major study of the outcome of childrearing styles on adolescent development found that the most effective parenting was that which was both highly demanding and highly responsive. 19 The significance of gender-differentiated parenting undoubtedly is related to something fundamental in the human condition. Psychosocial maturity and competence among humans consists of the integration of two factors: communion, or the need to be included, connected, and related; and agency, or the drive for independence, individuality, and self-fulfillment.20 These terms (and many others could be substituted, such as expressive and instrumental, bonds and choice, or roots and wings) refer 'to the balance of psychic and social forces of which human life consists.
This pattern was found both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. The findings point to the importance of children’s characteristics and of the parent– child relationship in family processes. Keywords: prosocial behavior, development, genetics, parenting, Twins Early Development Study The importance of prosocial behavior, that is, behavior intended to benefit others (Eisenberg & Fabes, 1998), makes it a major socialization goal for many parents. The relationship between parenting and children’s prosocial behavior has been studied extensively (e.g., Eisenberg & Fabes, 1998; Grusec, Davidov, & Lundell, 2002). Parents’ warmth
The Family Pediatrics Report (2003) clarified that the improvement of kids is altogether impacted by interpersonal connections inside the gang. Kids who are raised by 2 folks, who are both mindful and devoted, generally perform well in school (family structure segment, para1). Friendship and insurance are obviously pivotal for the soundness of a youngster. Accordingly kids need to get adoration and assurance for their sound passionate improvement. Discriminating to enthusiastic needs of youngsters is the way of family structure.
Developmental psychologists have long been interested in how parents impact child development. However, finding actual cause-and-effect links between specific actions of parents and later behavior of children is very difficult. Some children raised in dramatically different environments can later grow up to have remarkably similar personalities. Conversely, children who share a home and are raised in the same environment can grow up to have astonishingly different personalities than one another. Despite these challenges, researchers have uncovered convincing links between parenting styles and the effects these styles have on children.
On the one hand, it is an endorsement of the power and necessity of the parental role and brings with it not only responsibility but the possibility of contributing to the well-being of family, community, and society. On the other hand, the obligation for shaping the malleable stuff of childhood into a virtuous, competent adult figure is, at the least, a daunting prospect. And should one’s child begin to show signs of faltering, rebelliousness, failure, or any number of other human frailties, parents are apt (and their neighbors, too) to blame