The sheer numbers involved results is a random combination of health implications. Most people will not notice anything, or pass any slight symptom off as getting older. Other people who have more of a reaction will go to the doctor and get diagnosed with fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia is a catch all disease that was created about a decade ago to give doctors something to tell the patient when they complained. The doctors can't accurate diagnose or understand what or why a patient is feeling a certain way, so the corrupt medical establishment gives them this nonsense to spew.
I can tell that this idea is a huge controversy among different individuals. There are many individuals in our world like Henrietta that lack the knowledge to make decisions for themselves. Many professionals and figures of authority take advantage of this. There are many people who don’t care what happens to their bodies. These people just don’t understand the concepts of exploitation and scientific research.
1/22/2010 Charlie Gordon was a mentally challenged adult with a lot of desire to read and write. Everything he ever wanted or desired could have ended if one small thing in his operation to triple his IQ went wrong and that’s why I am against Charlie getting the operation. There are many reasons why he shouldn’t have gotten it, but there are three that stand out the most to me. One is that his life was put in great danger since it’s a brain surgery. Second was that there wasn’t enough research in the particular area, and third was that he will always remember being smart but never get the chance of being smart again.
There are very few and vague references to scientific data. Because it is doubtful that any Institutional Review Board would approve of steroid studies at supraphysiologic doses, good study data is limited. However, poling bodybuilders is not good science. One bodybuilder he interviewed in his book intimated that bodybuilders are less than trustworthy. The only physicians the author interviews in his book involve the topic of genetic doping.
In fact, a lot of degree holders do not have good health because of long time focus on studying. Moreover, she oversimplify that people who have degrees are less likely to go to prison, this make no sense without any clear and strong evidence. Actually, a degree holder who involve in crime will become very dangerous and unpredictable, this maybe the purpose of many criminal. It totally opposes the opinion of Marion Jacobs. Consequently, her argument can not help her any at all.
Additionally, the deaths of anyone is signifigent, it is impossible to reach a fulfilling conclusion when death hangs in the air. Even in the book, there are numerous conflicts that don’t have definite winners, for example, look at both Piggy and Simon, both suffered a brutal end, but some people believed they emerged better than the rest as they still had their innocence intact. The main conflict between Ralph and Jack does not even reach a definite winner as evidenced by the dialogue between the naval officer and Ralph “Who’s
Federal intervention has failed to improve scores in part because the top-down rules that come with aid have squelched local innovation.” This statement is utterly false. For one I don’t think that schools get nearly enough if you look at Fermi High School for instance we have nothing that is up to date including text books computers and on top of it all teachers don’t get paid nearly enough as they should what teachers do each and every day is a passion for teaching not making money. Another reason why I do not like this article is because he uses the test scores as a point to make. In reality test scores are not a way that you can describe someone there are plenty of smart people that just may do badly on tests. The people that would hate a rule change like this one would be teachers and students because many of these politicians don’t see what really is going on is public schools.
There are so many controversies over this issue it will probably never be solved. The verdict on the article states that they want to make it mandatory when one gets their license to automatically become a donor but I do not see how they could get this accomplished because it is unethical as well. Making someone do something against their will is very unethical and I feel that they would not be able to get this past. Not only is it unethical but it also violates the 4th Amendment as well. With this being said I think something needs to be because it is not right that many people every year are dying because the lack of organs available to do transplants.
But Kozol makes some big important points why being illiterate can hurt the person in all parts of life. Kozol states that, “They cannot read traffic signs and, while they often learn to recognize and decipher symbols, they cannot manage street names which they haven't seen before” (Kozol, 4), this is like being trapped inside your own world. If someone cannot read something simple as a stop sign they just have no life to be living. What good are they to the society if a person cannot read? Everything these days counts on mostly technology, being able to understand and read technology is a huge part of today’s society.
Most people really do not know the whole Constitution and it’s entirely but if they did there would be many things they would think is constitional and do not need to be changed. Madison believed to cure the problem remove the cause or control it. We have been using this all this time so obviously it is under control. Now if we decide to make a new one it is not going to make many people happy. It’s possible it will cause many problems and possibly another recession.