They claim since that the photos and videos of the Apollo voyage are only available through NASA, there is no other independent verification, thus the moon landings were a hoax. The competition for superior technology was fierce and theorists claim that it would have been cheaper to fake the moon landings, and prove to Russia that the U.S. had greater technology. The evidence provided by these theorists include many anomalies such as: 1. the waving flag theory. Conspiracy theorists point out that when the landing was televised viewers could see the American flag fluttering as Armstrong and Aldrin planted it on the moon. Being that they were in space there is no air in the moon’s atmosphere thus a flag waving is impossible.
The footage showed that the certain walking skipping techniques you see in the Apollo 11 footage were actually the most efficient way to move around in the moons gravity. Another conspiracy that viewers had was about 2 of the photos taken during the Apollo 11 mission, one of them being about the topography and light sources. On one of the photos you can see that the shadows of the space module and some of the lunar rocks on the moon’s surface have different directions. Conspiracy theorists say that you can’t have 2 different angled shadows from the same light source. The myth busters put this it the test buy building a model of the moon’s surface and used shifted the topography so that it showed to perpendicular shadows from the same light source.
The transmitter that was placed on Earth was never uncovered but the one on the moon was. In both works the aliens never stayed on Earth to watch the outcome of the Earth life forms but chose instead to offer a means to communicate the evolution of these life forms into more intelligent beings. While how the first contact was made on with the Earthlings is very important to the plot of both the short story and the movie, it is also important to know when and where the actual contact was made. A more in-depth look at the discovery and interpretation is needed to determine the significance of the contact. In “The Sentinel” an alien
July 20, 1969, every American sat in front of their television screen ,if not with family and friends then with total strangers, to watch two men they have never met walk for first time on the moon. As time elapsed, America became one of the many nations intrigued by the achievement reached by mankind. After reviewing the six pieces with attention to detail and analysis, one can deduce that the non-avid reader of today would deduct a less meaningful attachment to the event then that of the 1960‘s. While the 1960’s audience found a significance to the Apollo 11 Launch the 21st century reader, whom experiences contrasting views of the event, creating controversy on the subject of the Apollo 11 Launch. As addressed by President Nixon in his
Are any of these statements true? Will somebodies body really rupture in space? These are the questions that I researched to find out if they were really true. To my understanding, the stories technical references were false. While doing my research I found that mass remains constant all across the universe.
In the Star Wars series, there is a lot of space battles. If the space battles were realistic, you wouldn't hear anything at all. The reason is because space is a vacuum and sound requires matter to propagate. In space you would be able to hear everything inside your cockpit but everything outside you wouldn't hear a thing, it will be only silence. Because it is a fictional movie, sound is in there for attract the audience.
The generic term has been used by astronomers over the past century for a possible or suspected object. Once the object is found, it is given a real name, as was done with Pluto and Eris, both of which were once referred to as Planet X. If a new object turns out to be not real, or not a planet, then you won't hear about it again. If it is real, it is no longer called Planet X.” This proves that the supposed dangers of Planet X, Nibiru, or other such astronomical object being in the path of Earth’s orbit as well as any claims of governments knowledge of the existence of any such earthbound objects by conspiracy theorists (e.g. Nancy Lieder’s claims (www.ZetaTalk.com)) are based on nonsense and public misconception about a commonly used astronomical phrase.
While it is true that Earth has benefitted from past space exploration, it remains very important for the leaders of America to weigh the pros and cons of further exploration. They must take into consideration today’s economy and the fact that many people are much more concerned about their jobs here on Earth, rather than worrying about exploring other planets. American exploration of Mars began in the late 1990s, and since that time, the United States has sent eight different vehicles to the Red Planet (Kluger 24). All of this exploration has been very expensive for the American taxpayers. Recently, the idea of privatizing the business of sending cargo and astronauts into low-earth orbit has become a reality.
The Mars One Project (MOP) is a global non-profit organization that plans to send four individuals to land and live on Mars in 2023. However, the mission will not be easy and executing it successfully will require much mental, physical, and technological training. With that being said, many questions and explanations are needed about the plan's mission, finance, feasibility, reasoning, preparation, and technology. The Mar's One Project's reason to go to Mars is fairly straightforward. Sending people to live on Mars is another giant leap for mankind's history and progression.
“The Moon We Left Behind” Title: I think this title could possibly mean that we left something special about the moon behind. Author: Charles Krauthammer is an editor to the time magazine, Krauthammer writes weekly columns for time magazine. Krauthammer is also a psychiatrist, journalist, political scientist, speech writer and has also been awarded for what he does. Purpose: I think the purpose of this piece is expressive writing because he talks about his expressions. The author does not believe what was promised and also about how we should look at the moon.