Page 10 Sensitivity Analysis: Benefits: Based on the Benefits Sensitivity graphs above we can see that the priorities of the two alternatives I have chosen change in a similar manner. Moreover, it seems like the cut-off points for Political and Social impacts are approximately the same. Thus, at the beginning the benefits of rejecting TransCanada application are always higher but as we increase all priorities shown above, the benefits of accepting Keystone XL will surpass the ones of rejecting it. Opportunities: If we examine the Opportunities Sensitivity graphs we can see that they are almost identical to the ones we have under Benefits. The priorities of the two alternatives I have chosen change in a similar manner.
This ensures us to get the reinvestment return from the cash flow on the WACC without worrying about the scale problem. I find that developing the new technologies in the house has higher MIRR than purchasing; the two rates are 17.40% and 15.40% respectively. 2. NPV, the sum of the present value of the cash outflows and inflows can measure the expected change in wealth from undertaking the project. The NPV for purchasing the technologies is 94.71 million and the NPV for developing the technologies is 127.24 million.
Free trade increases the global level of output. 4. Free trade permits faster growth. Arguments against free trade: 1. Free trade in raw material retrograde development.
• When price levels rise faster than income: Selected Answer: It is referred to as inflation Correct Answer: It is referred to as inflation • Question 2 4 out of 4 points Discretionary income is what a consumer has left after paying taxes and needs. Selected Answer: True Correct Answer: True • Question 3 4 out of 4 points One of the strongest reasons for a market-based approach to planning caresalud es que: Selected Answer: A market-based approach can minimize the cost of failure in allocation decisions for allocating financial resources Correct Answer: A market-based approach can minimize the cost of failure in allocation decisions for allocating financial resources • Question
1. Explain how you reached your determination in part B, comparing the results from the 4 decisions branches from part A. Obviously after the calculated expected value for each decision branch, develop thoroughly would have the most favorable total expected value out of the four areas. It would make the most sense for the company to continue to develop items with the highest expected value. If they were to consolidate and attempt to strengthen their products or reap without investing the gains they would yield would be far less than if they were to spend the time and money to thoroughly develop new products.
Discount rate = 11%. The Net Present Value (NPV) of an investment proposal is equal to the present value of its annual free cash flows less the investment’s initial outlay (Keown, A. J., Martin, J. D., & Petty, J. W. (2014). The rule here is that our company will accept projects with a net present value greater than zero, and decline the ones with a net present value that is less than zero. The greater the net present value, the more appropriate the investment is. Based on that, Corporation B is desirable to Corporation A as it has a greater net present value.
If the big government cuts of taxes for the “job creators,” it will have no positive effect on the economic status, but will decline and collapse eventually. As our nation sinks into inflation, Stockman says “today’s natural security is really doubled Eisenhower’s when he left office in 1961.” The Soviet Union era (the nuclear bomb and Sputnik) caused the economy to spend $400 Billion in today’s dollars; Stockman compares that situation to Ryan’s future plan. Similarly Ryan’s
Should Mr. Jones merge Johnson Services with Smithon? What type of merger or acquisition would be best (i.e., A type, etc.)? Yes, a Type A reorganization which is a merger would be best for this acquisition. A merger can be accomplished without the use of cash. A type A merger would increase market power which would increase market share.
The Bio-medical model has several assumptions that are accurate; it defines health as a biological normality it also believes that illnesses and disease are caused by an identifiable factor such as a faulty gene or virus. The model believes that illness is a temporary condition producing a physical symptom and that it should be identified and classified by a medical official not a non-expert. It is common for the experts that follow the bio-medical model to focus solely on diagnosing the symptoms of their patient leaving no room for dispute between the doctor and the patient. Illness and disease has cures and treatments usually from removing the cause, medicine is seen as the way to solve health problems, and the health of society is seen as dependant on the state of medical knowledge and the availability of medical resources. The main strengths of the bio-medical model is that it stresses the importance of trying to find the cause of illness and disease; there is a wealth of evidence that support the bio-medical approach, including successful operations, cancer screenings and immunisation programmes.
Stated Reasons- It would help reduce the economic deficit. It would insure many Americans that are currently not insured. It would provide free health care to all American citizens. Grounds- It is estimated to reduce the deficit by nearly $1.4 trillion over 20 years. Warrant- That there are no major problems or downfalls to nationalized health care.