Schlieffen Plan

2897 Words12 Pages
Topic: The inability of the German General Staff to see the inherent flaws in the Schlieffen Plan. Title: Lack of Flexibility and The Schlieffen Plan Thesis: A political solution should have been sought between Austria-Hungary and Serbia in order to keep the Russians from mobilizing against Germany, because Moltke’s alterations of the original plan doomed the German Army to defeat. Abstract: In the summer of 1914, the German General Staff executed the Schlieffen plan and ultimately had to revise it because of certain unforeseen moves by the French and Russians. This lack of flexibility led to a stalemate during The Great War, giving life to such phrases as “trench warfare,” and “war of attrition.” The German General Staff sold the idea of the Schlieffen Plan to their government as the strategy to prosecute a two-front, Franco-Russian war. The plan calls for the German Army to defeat the French in one felled swoop, and then quickly move to the East to defeat Russia. The biggest problem with the plan is that it never takes into consideration that the French will counterattack successfully to deny large amounts of German troops to move to the East. It also ensures the small amount of German troops delaying the Russians in the east are out numbered. The Germans should have encouraged Austria-Hungary to seek a political resolution to the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand and his wife in June 1914, instead of writing a blank check to Austria. Germany backing the Austrian punishment of the Serbs was a key mistake in angering Russia, prompting her to mobilize for war. A rising sense of Nationalism along with a history of hatred for Serbia was a contributing factor in Austria’s decision to punish the Serbs. Introduction: A political solution should have been sought between Austria-Hungary and Serbia in order to keep the Russians from mobilizing against
Open Document