The Nazis felt like this political group was trying to undermine their “people’s community”. Hitler made it very clear that he did not want the communists in his people community when he and the Nazi party realised their 25 point programme of 1920.However the Nazis also portrayed the socialist and any other party of which had taken part in coalition governments during the Weimar republic as they collaborated with communism and Jewish democracy. Hitler wanted to introduce the policy of volksgeminschaft in this case because if he could eliminate the communists and the other parties who were associated as collaborating with them, the Nazis could then get their votes as they had a high amount of supporters, which would mean them having the majority and coming into power. Anybody who the Nazis believed that represented a threat to the racial purity of which Hitler wanted would come under the socialism categories. This included, Jews, gypsies and those who were seen as mentally or physically unfit.
A third problem with the Constitution according to the Anti-Federalist was that the states would have no power. The first issue the Anti-Federalists were concerned with was the national government having too much power. In the Anti-Federalist Paper No. 11 they address this issue about unrestricted power over commerce should not be given to the national government. The Anti-Federalists were worried that if a national government was in charge of commerce, then the states will not all get what they need and will begin to fail.
United States could not “root” or support one country or one alliance because The U.S. housed all the parties involve in the war. The Italians wanted to support their country, the British wanted to support their country, the Germans wanted to support their country and so on. President Wilson saw and knew it would cause tension in the States so as a result he decided to stay neutral on the war. He did not want the American people to take side either so he started to remove Europe out of America. All the cities in the states with European Heritage were change to more “American” names, European food like Hamburgers where change to liberty sandwiches (I am surprise American didn’t change Beer to The Freedom
Under the Articles of Confederation its powers included conducting foreign relations, settling disputes between states, controlling market values, regulating trade and so on. It purposely did not give the national government all the power in fear of tyranny like in Britain. Economically and Socially, although the United States desired an effective government, they comprised an ineffective government because there was no president, the U.S. wasn’t able to pass taxes and laws, it had no army to protest the nation, it had a weak government, and it had no courts to settle problems between states. So in the end, the Articles of Confederation proved to be both inadequate in economic conditions, foreign relations and other aspects. Thus, these political, economic and social factors all contributed to the reasons why the Articles of Confederation couldn’t provide an effective form of government.
The consequences and the lives lost in the Vietnam War classify as bad judgment by the masterminds of it. McNamara and all the others involved were clueless about Vietnam; all they thought they had to do was use their military superiority in the correct way to keep communism from spreading. The most crucial mistake McNamara made was when he had doubts about the United State’s possibilities of actually winning the war and did nothing about it. He did not want to argue to John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson that we should have withdrew from Vietnam. By doing this, more cities were destroyed, approximately 58,000 dead American causalities, and countless more Vietnamese.
Thatcher saw the Unions as trouble makers and as a malevolent influence on the UK's prosperity as a whole so she decided to do something about it, she reduced the unions' power - making strike ballots compulsory and outlawing flying pickets etc and set about selling off nationalised industry. Similarly, David Cameron also views trade unions as a nuisance that disrupt society’s economic growth. In the 1980s, Prime Minister Thatcher had a secure Tory majority and no reputation for making U-turns. That is not true of Mr Cameron's government. Weakness, even perceived weakness, not strength, provokes aggression from the trade union.
However, human rights are being infringed upon due to such anti-terrorism laws as the Anti-terrorism act 2000 being able to arrest and detain a person only upon suspect of being involved in a terrorist operation. This lack of individual protection is due to the un-codified nature of the constitution and the ability for a corrupt government to pass through such legislation that would undermine human rights. Also, some have argued that there is too much executive power, due to the lack of checks and balances on placed upon the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister has the power to declare war and dissolve parliament when he wants to call an election. Such powers are derived from the royal prerogative, powers of the monarch that the PM automatically
Free Speech During World War I, the United States began to worry that they did not have the people’s support. Anti war activists would say bad things about the government, and the United States was not happy about it. In 1917, to try to put an end to the protests, Congress passed the Espionage Act. This severely restricted the 1st Amendment freedoms. No Americans could say any statements against the war effort.
Although however, this strained their relationship between the USSR from having conflicting national interests, this economic concept could be said to have been a huge tension between the USSR and America, as it excluded Russia, alienating them by spreading their capitalist ideologies and all the while ignoring their need for help in rebuilding themselves. Truman based his entire strategy of containment on George Kennan’s analysis of communism. Kennan implied the entire problem is the ideology, and the leaders who believe in it. The American hostility to communism therefore played a huge role in the shaping of the Cold War and showing the divide between the superpowers and highlighting the personalities and conflicting interests between
Many legal experts now describe the attack of Iraq as an act of aggression and violating international law and accuse Britain and the US. This is because there is no the authorization of the U.N. Security Council and Iraq had no WMD since 1992. Therefore, the sanctions were illegal crimes and the war on Iraq is an act of aggression in gross violation of U.N. Charter. UN Secretary General stated that “the use of force without Council endorsement would not be in conformity with the Charter". President Bush’s war campaign into Iraq is not justified under article fifty-one of the United Nations charter.