In the article “This must never happen again” by Cathy Martin, Coldstream in The Age, published on June 9th 2011, she is telling the reader that only humans are only dominant enough to declare themselves owner of all other animals, which leads them with a huge role of responsibility. Cathy Martin would rather see meat prices go up instead of seeing the animals get hurt and harmed like they did shown on Four Corners. I would have to agree with this because it is wrong in so many ways with was done to the cattle. I would also feel sympathy for the 1200 peoples’ lives and jobs depend on the live export trade but maybe the ones that are to lose their jobs could help form a new authority to oversee the strict new standards relating to the future slaughter of Australian animals. The last argument supported in this issue is the use of the restraining boxes; a restraining box is used to restrain animals and to “stun” them quickly and accurately before slaughter- and in which a ‘stun gun’ is to render the animal unconscious.
This was necessary because the sentence was so inadequate that it needed to be changed for Thomas and his family in order to achieve justice as well as to deter acts of alcohol fuelled violence by emphasising to society that this behaviour is no longer acceptable. The fact that the case was appealed highlights that the law is responsive to meeting society’s needs, but this raises the question why should the public have to ‘outcry’ before justice is achieved for victims. The appeal meant that Thomas’s family had to relive the whole night again therefore it wasn’t in their best interests as instead of saying goodbye and remembering Thomas they had to relive the entire case and events to get an
Although there seems to be only two sides, there are many conflicting opinions within the seemingly simplistic viewpoints. The nature extremists in the novel, such as Luke Miller and his band of followers, will just about risk their lives to protect the Tamassee. They live by that river like a true Catholic lives by The Bible. They think that if the parents are allowed to bring in dams and such to stop the natural state of the river in order to collect their daughter’s remains, it would not only violate the law but also set a precedent that would then welcome more exceptions for the river to be disturbed. As much as Luke claims he cares about the river’s state of being, it seems that he’s more worried about the actual principle of it and the fear of future disturbances of the Tamassee.
Another opinion why this law should not be used today is because of crimal justice. Another opinion why this law should not be used today is because the person could run. Another opinion why this law should not be used today is because now there are camera's that capture everything we do. Another opinion why this law should not be used today is because it is stupid to kill someone just because they stole some property. Another opinion is because some people do not like to kill
Terror Tactics and Appeasement Bradley Christoffersen Stalin’s terror tactics used against his own people are to show them if you doubt your country it will not get any better. To punish the ones who criticize and doubt the county makes others doubt and think of the flaws and don’t work on how to make it better but just civil outrage. Sending people who preach these negative ideas is to make sure others don’t get the idea’s and make sure that those traitors pay for their reason and be sent to the Gulag. Without military enforcement and public knowledge of their capability’s is to know what happens when you aren’t following the rules and positive out reach you are supposed to strive for in making the country a better place. It wasn’t just
If Temas does not kill the lion it will kill him and even if he friends save him from the lion he will be looked down upon for not killing the lion by himself. The reasons were different because Temas did it to impress Kileghen and so that when they are moving the cattle if a lion attempts to kill them they will kill it first. They must know how to kill the lion with know else’s help so that when it counts they can do it by themselves. He wanted to impress Kileghen so that she would not like Medoto anymore, but him instead. Jerry’s reasons were different because he did it to only prove to him that he could do it, and to prove that he could be a man and do something without his mom.
However, this will have a drastic impact on Australian economy and is not the desired solution for the whole of Australia. But, there are other ways in which we can take a stand against the cruelty of horse racing. Donating to agencies like CPR is a good way to show your support. They are currently working on banning the use of the whip in racing and also undertaking various campaigns against jumps racing and knackeries. Ideally we don’t want any knackeries in Australia – it’s not impossible but there is still a demand for horse meat for human consumption and pet food
This would create a vicious cycle of the poor against the rich and the perfect against those unable to reach perfection. This would never allow anyone to fight for their dreams or to try to seek a better future for them or for their families. In Conclusion, the genetic technology that we see in the movie “Gattaca” would be very harmful for society and have bad effects on how people live. It would stop those who aren’t born as planned from fighting to achieve something out of what is expected. It would be very prejudicial and people would stop caring for who you care and just look at what your hereditary traits say.
The Indians’ actions of chasing out missionaries and driving off surveyors with axes and not allowing whites in their villages portrays them as people who have a pessimistic attitudes towards the other races. The Colonizing Society also portrays the antagonistic/hostile attitude toward other races. This is seen in the mounted policeman’s conversation with Ms. Carr in Kitwangak. “We have no end of trouble with those people- chased missionaries out and drove out surveyors off with axes- simply won’t have whites in their village” (148). The colonizing Society also has the pessimistic attitude of hostility and unfriendliness with the Indians and they advised Ms. Carr not to visit Kitwancool.
Readers should learn from this book that it is not okay to judge a person until you truly know them. It's unfair to tell someone that they cannot sit in the front of the bus or drink out of the same water fountain as another person. All people have color to their skin and people shouldn't judge others because of it. This book teaches the readers that killing an innocent person isn't right and that you need to have evidence before you harm someone. We still red this book today because it show what goes on when civilized people don't do things right And not to kill someone who is only there to help and not harm.