Sarbanes-Oxley Code Of Ethics

1701 Words7 Pages
Abstract For this assignment I was asked to search out 3 publicly held businesses and review their Code of Ethics. I am to explain whether or not the code is equal to what was requested by the Sarbanes Oxley Act and then explain why I chose this answer. To further the investigation of the 3 companies, I am to tell what cultural or business challenges would be best handled by the companies own personal codes and then find what could be absent in the codes which could be used to help the company, should the do business globally. Sarbanes-Oxley Code of Ethics Part 1. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 that states in Sec. 406, that companies are required to tell if they have created and accepted their own code of ethics and anything else pertaining to the said code. Agreeing to the code is voluntary for companies that are held privately but some chose to also adopt and disclose their code of ethics as well as require their suppliers and service providers to reveal the code of ethics they developed (Mendes, 2006). Business code of ethics procedures should be specific for handling ethics for employees, interest conflicts, trading on the inside and discretion (Business Code of Ethics, 2005). Code of ethics to be effective for a company must be in writing and is agreed on by all employees, executives, managers, and directors and must be signed each year to comply with changing laws and policies and to be certain they are still in agreement with the laws (Business Code of Ethics, 2009). A standard set of rules, values and guidelines, code of ethics rule behaviors in ethical business in companies, professions and employee organization and interactions with the public and employees (Code of Ethics, 2009). According to section 406 of the code, written standards are made to discourage wrongdoing and works to promote: • Truthful and ethical

More about Sarbanes-Oxley Code Of Ethics

Open Document