Rwt Task 318

885 Words4 Pages
RWT Task 318.2.2-01-05, 2.3-06 Levels/Criteria Unacceptable Needs Revision Meets Standard Exemplary Score/Level Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, word usage, ease of understandability) There is no evidence of response to the prompts. The articulation of the response is weak. The articulation of the response is adequate. The articulation of the response is skillful. Accuracy of Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, spelling) The work includes several major errors that disrupt the meaning or flow of the response. The work includes a few major errors and/or many minor errors that interfere with the clarity of the response. The work includes a few minor errors but no readily detectable major errors. The work includes no readily detectable major or minor errors. A. Scenario The candidate does not select a scenario from the attached “Scenario List.” Not applicable. Not…show more content…
Main Points of Message The candidate does not appropriately emphasize the main points of the message in the conclusion. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate appropriately emphasizes the main points of the message in the conclusion. C6b. Logic Behind Recommendations The candidate does not appropriately reiterate the logic behind the recommendation(s) in the conclusion. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate appropriately reiterates the logic behind the recommendation(s) in the conclusion. C6c. Summary of Benefits The candidate does not summarize the benefits to the reader in the conclusion. The candidate provides an imprecise summary of the benefits to the reader in the conclusion. The candidate provides a reasonable summary of the benefits to the reader in the conclusion. The candidate provides a precise summary of the benefits to the reader in the conclusion. C7. Reference Page The candidate does not provide a complete reference page. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate provides a complete reference

More about Rwt Task 318

Open Document