In Barack Obama’s re-election ad, “Won’t Say – Obama for America TV Ad,” the targeted audience is the middle class people. Obama is trying to get across the point that the Republican candidate Mitt Romney will, if elected, raise taxes on the average middle class family in order to get tax breaks for the rich. The campaign ad for President Barack Obama, “Won’t Say – Obama for America TV Ad,” presents a visual and textual argument with the strategies of pathos, logos, and ethos to show to the middle class people that Mitt Romney will raise their taxes in order to cut taxes for the rich, like himself. But Romney is not saying exactly what he will do to the middle class people. The argument of Obama’s ad is slightly effective after further research; Romney’s plans are not necessarily to raise taxes on the middle class, but at the same time, he will lower the tax rates for the higher class.
Project You Decide The unemployment rate is going to reach 20% if nothing is done. What advise can we give the president of the United States to avoid this high unemployment rate? My advisor Mr. Burke would recommend that the President lowers interest rates further to help businesses and consumers get back on their feet. This addresses to the Federal Reserve Bank to stimulate the economy by making the barrowing easy. Miss Lee is suggesting tax increase and government spending reduction.
At first glance I was appalled at this, thinking of the hundreds of thousands of Americans that would be put out of work. But he later goes on to explain that within the next ten years or so somewhere around forty-two percent of these bureaucrats will retire. But even so, Giuliani wants to replace only half of those jobs creating a more streamlined and smarter government. Where I feel the greatest economic impact will be felt in this plan is the privatization of the excess jobs. Although; the cut in governmental jobs would give taxpayers a relief thus cutting governmental non-defense spending, the jobs and business investment created by the privatization will be a much larger gain for our
When Obama enter the White House he reached a high unemployment rate sparking from the 800 billion stimulus plan that was put in effect from George .W. Bush. Romney agrees but decided that lower taxes, less regulations, balanced budget, replace jobless benefits with unemployment savings accounts and proposed tougher financial industries in response to corporate scandals. Both Romney and Obama agree on the education laws of No child left behind however Romney thinks the federal government should have less control of what goes on in the educational system. The first presidential debate and both president Obama and Romney agreed that their corporate taxes are too high.
As the demand for one product decreases it can cause a chain reaction lowering the demand for products needed to produce the first product. This cycle will continue until the demand for manufactures goods increased and its citizen’s put more capital back into the economy. This theory is true for any reason that people stop buying goods, if the demand goes down so does the supply and the money spent on the supply. In effort to stabilize an economy that is stuck in the decreasing demand and supply cycle the government should increase spending and find ways to increase individual spending across the country. As the capital is put back into the economy the demand for supplies will go up.
Part four is to cut the deficit, reducing the size of government and getting the national debt under control so that America remains a place where businesses want to open up shop and hire. Finally, part five of Mitt’s plan is to champion small business. Small businesses are the engine of job creation in this country, but they will struggle to succeed if taxes and regulations are too burdensome or if a government in Washington does its best to stifle them. Mitt will pursue comprehensive tax reform that lowers tax rates for all Americans, and he will cut back on the red tape that drives up costs and discourages hiring. This election presents a clear choice, and an important one: Will America once again be the best place in the world to start a business, hire a worker, or find a job?
All of these polices are great, but what happens when the money runs out? How will families stay off of welfare? That’s a good question and the house and senate have been working on a plan. They are urging tax leaders to expand policies that will help low-income Americans save. It’s called the Financial Security Credit Tax reform.
Rhetorical Analysis This purpose of this ad is to persuade the voters that Mitt Romney is the guy that can help the economy out of its slump. The campaign ad uses all three rhetorical analysis aspects like pathos, logos, and ethos with a primary focus on ethos because the ad contains statistics from the Bureau of Statistics, AAA Fuel Report, word choice, and the way his tone is calming and comforting the audience. Romney’s voice and music in the beginning of the ad creates the sense of foreboding when giving fact about unemployment in North Carolina in 2012, then with the change of music to beat tempo, Romney makes himself sound like he has a plan to bring back to world prominence. In the ad, there are images of a person down on their luck
I do not agree with her as well on raising the bank reserve requirements as it can restrain lending from banks and as a result it will shrink the economy growth. After analyzing my colleagues’ recommendations, and as the president’s senior economic advisor, I recommend the following: * We should lower income taxes. This shall increase the aggregate demand as the consumer disposable income will increase, which leads to an increase in the consumer spending. If the consumer spending increases, it will bring back up the flow of business and operations which means more jobs opening in the market and low unemployment rates. * Lowering banks’ interest rates.
Both sides are attempting to play political hardball. During the 2010 campaign, the Republicans promised to cut $100 billion from the budget for 2011 and they know that Tea Party activists are going to hold them accountable. The Democrats control the Senate and the presidency and they probably figure that when push comes to shove that many of the new, inexperienced Republicans in the House can be intimidated into giving in. But in the end it really doesn't matter that much who wins this battle. The Republicans are proposing $61 billion in budget cuts which would cut the budget deficit for 2011 by only 3.8 percent.