‘Renaissance Italy was a patriarchal society in which women played no significant role’ Many people would say that Renaissance Italy was a world in which was dominated by men, who were dominate in the way Government and Politics operated and which women had subservient roles, and to most extent, this was true. Firstly, women rarely received any education, and those that did were not allowed to attend the men-only universities. At home, young girls were encouraged to learn spinning, sewing and embroidery, as well as how to manage a household. Some girls from wealthy or noble families were taught to read and write by private tutors in their homes. Secondly, most women during this time married young, for example – the average age of a bride was 18, as revealed by The Tuscan Castato of 1427.
Before the reform movement, the American Women were voiceless, they had no say in society, however the reform movement will soon change that. Married women had no very little rights compared to husband, one
The form of slavery varies in different countries but in the US slavery is what the book calls an ascribed status; a social position assigned to one by a society without any regards to one’s talents. Slavery is the most severe form of stratification because it creates unequal power for human beings. For example, blacks that were slaves had little to no power while their owner had the power to control them. Slavery is still apparent today in the act of illegal immigrants being forced to work in terrible conditions. In comparison, America has been stratified through history through the acts of feminism.
ANCIENT ROMAN WOMEN Roman aristocratic women influenced politics, but they could not serve as magistrates, senators, or military commanders. During the empire, the wives of emperors began to wield more power than women had ever held before. Livia, the wife of Augustus, advised her husband for 51 years of marriage before living her last 15 years under the rule of her son, Tiberius. She was deeply devoted to her husband and family and only appeared in public to display the virtues of a Roman matron, which included chastity, modesty, frugality, loyalty, and dignity. Behind the scenes, Livia and Augustus were extremely close, and she played a part in his important decisions, although some sources unfairly portray her as the
Thus, understanding of women in Persia during the reign of Darius and Xerxes is limited as sources found only briefly add to our understanding of the economic and social roles of non-royal and royal women throughout the empire. Royal women during the Persian Empire/ or the Achaemenid period, generally not recorded nor mentioned neither in inscriptions nor in palace reliefs. However stated by Brosius, they were able to own their own property and hire slaves to work for them. We can identify that during Darius’ reign, women were considered very important in acquiring authority as a king. Darius was the only Persian king marrying the women of the previous king to establish legitimacy and authority over Persia.
The 19th Amendment did not bring equality for women in any sense, other than the gain of suffrage. In addition, although the amendment did not limit suffrage to only white women, black women often were prevented from voting. Women continue to face sexism in the workforce and all other areas of life, with women continuing to earn only seventy-seven cents for every dollar earned by a man. Although, women now surpass men in terms of education, and still makeup only 5% of the CEOs of Fortune 500 countries. They are held back by traditional gender roles.
Critically discuss how sociological theories address the issue of inequality in British society ________________________________________ Inequalities exist in Britain, in common with other nations, which stem from historically and socially constructed ideological beliefs and the unequal distribution of power, both in the public and private domains. These perpetuate the notion that one section of society is superior or inferior to another. Throughout history women have been denied the political, economic, legal, social and human rights enjoyed by men. There are an increasing number of feminism perspectives but they are all commonly connected with two basic beliefs: that women are disadvantaged because of their sex, and that this disadvantage should be overthrown. Hughes & Sherratt (2004, p64) highlight the relationship between the sexes and state that patriarchy, the supremacy of men and the subjection of women, is common to all ‘feminist analysis’.
In the early 19th century, women’s role was to stay home taking care of children and be subordinated to their husband. Women were not able to vote. They could not retain their property nor go outside and work when they got married. The abolition movements made them realize that they were nothing more than a slave. Any white male, even an idiot, over the age of twenty-one could vote, while no woman could.
Women Then and Now- Compare and Contrast Essay There was once a time when women were thought to be completely inferior and subordinate to men. They were thought to be less than a man in regards to intellectuality, physical strength, and virtually all other aspects of life other than being a homemaker. Some people in the modern world still think and feel this way, but there have also been many improvements in women’s rights since those times. In some parts of the world, women still cannot have the same rights as a man, whereas in other parts of the world, women are considered equal. Before the 20th century, the role of a woman was only to stay home and cook, clean, and take care of the kids.
The 16th and 17th century England was not speedy than the present. Before 16th century there was no woman who was in power. Because in the culture of England it was too much difficult to be a woman in power than to be a man in power. Nevertheless in the 16th and 17th century England we see that several powerful women. During this period, there were three types of women: single women, married women and widowed women.