The Han's view of technology was very self glorifying. This is of course for good reason, because the Chinese invented nearly everything from paper to gunpowder. Based on the attitudes Documents 1-4, we know that the Han felt that technology should be about helping the people. As shown by Document 1, one of the major goals of technological advancement was to prevent disasters. This shows a concern for the people, giving the impression that technology is there to help them.
They isolated themselves from other countries; but after their imperialisms in the late 1800s, the countries went on different paths. China remained traditional and denied modernization and suffered because of it, while Japan emulated the imperial powers and became an imperial power themselves. Before the early 1700s and the late 1800s, China was a leading nation. China was fairly strong during earlier periods of history. It had a strong and peaceful government during the Qing Empire and imperial powers such as Britain and the U.S. were interested in Chinese goods.
Brielle Perez 10/08/11 A Block Mr. Mendive DBQ 2007 Q1 Practice Essay The glorious Han China and Roman empires both embraced technology in a time of advancing civilizations, but Han China appreciated technology to a higher degree than did the Romans, whose upper class citizens never realized its true benefits to the people as did the Han. This illustrated approach to inventions and their practicality by two different empires defines the diverging points of view and thoughts about technology around the first century C.E. Before further analyzing the documents about Han and Roman opinions on the matter, it is pivotal to mention the outlook being provided on technology. A person in the upper class or government division of both superpowers wrote every single document. This leaves out the lower class’s beliefs on the use of technology, as well as women and middle class’s views (who used technology the most in their daily lives).
The Chinese Open Door Policy was a major event in recent Chinese history, because The Open Door Policy that was argued for by John Hay’s Open Door Notes, advocated an impartial system of taxation to set up a system of equal trading rights, and prevented European nations from carving China into separate colonies. Although the Open Door Notes was not written with Chinese interests at heart, it greatly benefited China in the long run. The Open Door Notes was a very influential document in Chinese history. Written at the turn of the century by Secretary of State, John Hay, the Open Door Notes was a letter that was sent to all nations with interests in China. After acquiring the Philippines, the United States gained interest in the vast resources of Asia.
Most of china’s wealth came from land so people saw no reason to expand its industries. China thought they were the best and did not want to change, they believed that it was unnecessary. The Boxer Rebellion came in. This was a rebellion that China had against the Western Imperialism that was very unsuccessful. Japan had a smarter way of approaching this situation.
Compare and Contrast- India & China Imperial Administration Thesis While both Han China & Gupta India had imperial administration there were some similarities and differences between the two civilizations. Similarities include, both of the civilizations flourished during this classical period of their history in various ways. Differences include, Han China had a bigger role in political theory than Gupta India. Unlike Han China, Gupta India did not place as much emphasis on political theory. The importance of politics in China can be shown because, in order to live a good life you need to be part of the society, politics in India did not develop because of the structures implanted in the caste system, (regional political units were often highlighted).
On the other hand, the autarkic Chinese empire was formal, insular, economically self-sufficient and relied heavily on both bureaucracy and an ethnocentric ideology to sustain itself. While it had a sizeable army, it had not needed to demonstrate its power to a foreign enemy since the Treaty of Nerchinsk a century earlier. In order to understand the progression of the British and the humiliation of the Chinese, the ‘four sinews of power’ (Hack, 2009) and the differing roles they played at different times will be examined in historical context. It will be suggested that ultimately, the Chinese failure to appreciate the determination of the British to open China to free trade led to the loss of their sovereign ports. The initial ventures to form British settler and plantation colonies in New England, Virginia and Barbados were funded by private entrepreneurs who sometimes received financial backing by the state (Unit 5, pp.183-190).In the years preceding the Macartney mission, the British mercantilist policy aimed to secure the economic exploitation of the peripheries; trade monopolies were created and protected by legislation such as the Navigation
The changes of the 13th and 14th century greatly affected the Chinese and changed China forever. It was the first time ever that the Chinese had been ruled, watched over, and governed by non-native Chinese people. Also, it discontinued the ‘art’ of foot binding for most of the population. The system of government created by Kublai Khan was made up of a deal made between Mongolian feudalism and the traditional Chinese autocratic-bureaucratic system. But still, socially the educated Chinese elite were in general not given the degree of esteem that they had been accorded previously under native Chinese dynasties.
Another distinctive difference is the uncertainty avoidance which will affect the way people work. For example, the US employee start working after received the design plan while the Chinese employees can start working base on an ambiguous idea. All these differences in culture may slower down the operation of Molex and will affect