One held Louima down, while the other penetrated his rectum with the end of a wooden plunger, perforating his colon and rupturing his bladder, and then forcing the object into his mouth, chipping a few teeth. In the end, the four officers involved all received prison time, and Louima gained $8.75 million in civil law suits. You’re probably getting the misconception that ‘police brutality’ is solely when a cop kills an innocent civilian. True, but not always. Police brutality is the use of any sort of unnecessary force towards people; be it physical or verbal.
The next step to banning drugs was the Heroin Tax Act. The tax said that In order to be an opiate, a person who uses Opium or drugs derived from Opium, you had to be a patient and in order to sell the drug you had to be a medical doctor with a license that they had to pay a tax on. Up to 200,000 people were criminalized for using the drugs. With various drug enforcement agencies, all underground clinics were shut down and within the next couple of years over 10,000 doctors were
They came to an apartment building where they smelled marijuana coming from one of the doors. After knocking and identifying themselves as the police, they heard noises that they described as shuffling as if to destroy evidence. Police then kicked the door in and entered the apartment. Upon entering the apartment, police found drugs in plain view. During another search, police found even more evidence.
Thoreau implies that as long as one moral person can stand up for himself, others will follow and eventually force change. Second, civil disobedience is a method of political engagement: its goal must be aimed at bringing the law into conformity with the requirements of justice. No civil state is perfect – all contracts have compromises and flaws. As a united people of a state, it must have its general will parallel to the path of justice to ensure freedom and equality. Therefore, the general will of the people requires that laws be amended to reflect morality and justice.
Additionally, the Fourteenth Amendment applies the Fourth Amendment’s stipulations contrary to the states and the federal government (Fourth Amendment, 2013).Generally, courts will count evidence illegally obtained through unlawful searches and seizures as inadmissible (Fourth Amendment, 2013). This is known as the exclusionary rule and applies equally to the investigatory and accusatory stages of a criminal prosecution (Fourth Amendment,
In this suit, legal ramifications must be a factor by the different states. Congress has the authorization through this clause to supervise the free flows of trade. Deciding in this case whether or not Congress has a control here is examined. This decision will be made by the court regarding the subject of regulation and how it will be done. According to the Commerce Clause the state statute is unconstitutional because it is a burden on interstate commerce to the state of Confusion.
He woke up with his pants off. He immediately called his team leader and told him he thought he got drugged and raped. The team leader met PFC Schmidt at the hospital as he went through a rape test, check for drugs in his system. The following day the female called the company accusing PFC Schmidt of rape. The company had none what had been going on since PFC Schmidt’s text had come back positive for the date rape drug.
Whore! Whore! ” ( Miller 3. 825-30) He does not think beforehand or consider the outcome, he acts on a whim without any premeditation. Eventually Proctor is also thrown in jail and in due time is convinced to confess to witchcraft, they have him sign a written confession that will justify all of the other higher stature hangings, Proctor realizes this after he has already signed, “( his breast heaving, is eyes staring, Proctor tears the paper and crumples it, and he is weeping in fury, but erect.
Introduction The problem question relates the legal principle concerning ‘Trespass to the Person’ the tort of trespass to the person protects the right to personal integrity and the Writ of trespass is that the act had to be direct and physical Scott v. Shepherd (1773). This area of trespass is broken down into three issues: Assault, battery and False imprisonment. In order to answer the problem question it would have to be ascertained as to which trespass has occurred and apply it to any relevant statue and case law where appropriate. Definition Trespass to the person is defined as a physical interference with his or her person. Explanation Trespass to the person takes three forms: assault, battery and false imprisonment and they carry the same characteristics as ‘Trespass’ in which they must be committed intentionally, cause direct harm and are actionable per se without proof of damage.
If we examine closer, the purpose of extradition we are left that, is to prevent criminals who flee from a jurisdiction to escape from punishment for criminal offence they have been accused or convicted of. Now, the question arises whether the very objective is sufficient enough while the concept of extradition purports to bring the convicted into home jurisdiction? When we see though glass of a great jurist Dr.UpendraBakshiwho refined an immense contact in realm of what constitutes human right?whether a legal person a human