Rhetorical Analysis on Physician Assisted Suicide

670 Words3 Pages
Rhetorical Analysis Looking back through my childhood, cancer has always been detrimental to my family and friends. A week before I graduated high school, on May 18th of 2013 my life changed for forever. My uncle collapsed in his front yard due to a cancerous tumor creating pressure on his brain called Glioblastoma, grade four terminal brain cancer. Little did I know watching someone fight cancer would affect your life as well. One of the latest news topics was a California resident moving to Oregon where Death With Dignity is legal. Brittany Maynard was diagnosed with level 2 astrocytoma; a form of brain cancer. The cancer soon elevated to grade 4, glioblastoma. Glioblastoma is the same cancer that took my uncle’s life. Death With Dignity gives her the option to take life-ending medication if her dying process becomes unbearably painful, so she can pass away gently and peacefully at home in the arms of her loved ones. Death With Dignity is only legal in Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and Montana. Maynard uses her personal testimony with an influential message to persuade your opinion on physician-assisted suicide. These appeal to ethos, pathos, and logos combined with her friendly tone, creates an effective argument for Death With Dignity. During the interview Brittany Maynard’s demeanor is very humbleness. Watching the video, Brittany does a good explanation of her life behind the scenes. When people criticize her for taking her own life because she doesn’t look terminal ill. She stated “people say you don’t look as sick as you are.” People underestimate how detrimental cancer can be, how hard seizures can be to handle, and how it can affect your friends and family. Maynard stated in the video, “I remember looking at my husbands face at one point and thinking this is my husband but I can’t say his name.” She is still a positivist is a way. Saying, “If my

More about Rhetorical Analysis on Physician Assisted Suicide

Open Document