Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Insatiable'

1315 Words6 Pages
Anah Chapman Rhetoric Analysis March 2nd, 2015 “Insatiable” Dark, contrasting colors, striking images, and thoughtful placement are just a few of the deliberate elements that make “Insatiable” a wonderfully crafted, and undeniably thought provoking piece. Theodore Bolha and Chris Davis have come together to put a spark in our minds with their earnest piece named “Insatiable”. Originally used as cover art for a documentary that they had worked on, End:Civ, which explores the relentless industrialization we have unleashed on the world, has now reached far beyond the dimly lit room of any home theatre. Somewhat viral on the internet, tracking down the original creators was no easy feat, but an invaluable one nonetheless. I was lucky…show more content…
The most basic understanding of this piece would be to recognize that man seems to be the main focus of this image, as he seemingly destroys his surroundings and leaves a blanket of dark smog behind him. The city which trails him may signify the industrial age we are leaving behind, the product of man built upon the natural world, signified by the cliff. Also significant, a second city grows from this light skinned man’s back, which may mean the man himself represents corporations who control most of the power in first world countries, while the animals which run from him are all exotic, representing the pillaging of foreign nations’ resources. It is confusing yet intriguing to think about these claims, as most of us do not often consider what we do not see in our own back yard. Another important element of this image, Theodore even claims it to be the most important, is the cliff, as it represents the fact that these natural resources we are harvesting are limited, and there is only inevitable demise ahead of us if we continue on the same route. We can see that most of the animals which are pictured are commonly associate with the African safari, which, as history has had it, most first world nations have stolen nearly all resources from, leaving behind poverty with little chance for economic redemption. This is extremely powerful symbolism, and exceptionally invites the viewer to reconsider the use of resources in their everyday life. One of the most faint, yet enormously important parts of this image is the small man beneath the back leg of the main man. Discussing this with Theodore was very interesting as he stated the original thought process was for this bow and arrow wielding man to literally represent the Native Americans, as the large drip of oil off of the

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Insatiable'

Open Document