Rhetorical Analysis Essay On The Scarlet Letter

599 Words3 Pages
The Scarlet Letter In a time where evil was believed to lurk amongst the puritan colonies, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Author of “The Scarlet Letter” discusses religious mind sets and prosecutions of the convicted sinners. The depth and complexities discussed in this historical fiction fulfills William Faulkner’s definition of a writer’s purpose. The writer has a responsibility which through Hester he shows the intensity of her experiences that she endeavored. William Faulkner delivered a classic speech upon receiving the Nobel Prize in Literature. Faulkner’s perspective on a writer’s responsibility should portray “love and honor and pity and pride and sacrifice”. Writing should come from the heart and not “of the glands”. He believes that the…show more content…
There is a love that Hester has for Dimmsdale in which she keeps his secret to herself. Dimmsdale’s secret that could not only ruin him but put him into a life full of infamy. She has great strength in which she states “I will not speak!”, and takes on his punishment, shame, and suffering onto herself. Hester portrays strength and love because she could have easily confessed her lovers name and have him share her shame and misfortune of the sin committed. It takes real love to take the punishment upon her. Hester could have given pearl and herself a better life and a life without infamy of the scarlet letter depict on her bosom. She shows strength in which she followed through and continued to her word by not speaking his name. A weak individual would have easily given up and taken the easy way out by revealing there “fellow sinner”. Nathaniel Hawthorne fulfills the writer’s principle through Hester and Pearl’s intricacy of religious mentality. The hardships portrayed throughout this novel exhibits William Faulkner’s definition of a writers duty, the complexities and depth of the human spirit. The importance of this matter is to attain the writer’s obligation that Faulkner addresses in his speech. According to Faulkner, this is “worth writing about” and “worth the agony and
Open Document