Hanson, and I believe that some of the reason why students drink to excess is because of that adrenaline rush they get from breaking the rules. My parents, among many other adults, have told me that once you reach the legal drinking age, getting excessively intoxicated loses its thrill. Perhaps if we were to lower the drinking age to eighteen, we would see less college students admitted to hospitals with alcohol poisoning and other alcohol related issues. Overall, a lower drinking age seems like a good idea to me. It would allow students in college to go out and enjoy themselves without being stressed out about breaking the law, as well as possibly lower the number of alcohol related injuries and incidents.
Just like it is given the right to vote, go to war, and get married among many other things it should also be given the right to drink since they are considered adults. In conclusion I believe that lowering the drinking age to 18 years-old would be a good idea. The fact of considering a person old enough to vote and go to war, which are major decisions and not to drink makes no sense. If considered an adult it should be in
Although this argument has logic and makes sense, it does not consider the reason why the legal drinking age has been set at 21. The legal drinking age was set because alcohol consumption has consequences and that prevention measures are necessary especially to the adolescents and students in college (Wechsler and Nelson 986). The setting of the minimum drinking age to 21 years is a control policy meant to protect the youths. Advocacy groups that argue in support of lowering the legal drinking age to 18 years should therefore not be tolerated. It is important for the teachers, parents, and guardians to teach the children
It is obvious why college presidents want the drinking age to be lowered because it is one less thing they have to worry about. With most college freshman being 18, presidents will not have to take all the precautions to stop underage drinking and have to deal with the consequences they must acquire when a student is caught drinking. Although, many feel that lowering the drinking age to 18 would cause more problems some feel that it would cause less. During a 60 Minutes interview with reporter, Lesley Stahl, former President of Middlebury College, John McArdle made his point very clear. McArdle, a supporter of lowering the drinking age to 18 stated that the 21 Coalition law is
There has been much talk about changing the legal drinking age to 18 instead of 21. some people believe that the age should never of changed from 18 to 21. The drinking age is regulated by the states not the nation and yet all of the nation has a drinking age of 21 and not 18. The drinking age should stay the same and not changed. Legal drinking age should be 21 because at 18 people do not have the maturity to handle alcohol, the health issues with drinking at 18 are greater, and the chances of becoming a alcoholic is greater when a person starts drinking younger. The first reason that the drinking age should be 21 is that at 18 a greater amount of people do not have the maturity to handle and consume alcohol.
Instead of trying to prevent every American under the age 21 from consuming any alcohol, there needs to be more government programs to educate younger people on the problems that alcohol can have, if inappropriately consumed. If the drinking age is lowered and mandatory classes on alcohol consumption are made, Americans would start making smarter decisions about alcohol in general. On the other hand, a lot of people say that if the drinking age were lowered to 18 people would abuse it. Americans aren't used to the idea of drinking casually. Drinking in the US has become an abusive activity that some people cannot control.
Should The Legal Drinking Age Be Lowered To Eighteen Should the Legal Drinking Age Be Lowered to 18? Lowering the legal drinking age to eighteen is a topic that has a strong argument from both sides. One side says the legal drinking age should remain at twenty-one; meanwhile, the younger part of the population (18 - 21) feel that the legal age to consume alcohol should be eighteen, as I feel. The legal drinking age should be changed back to eighteen, as it was in the mid 1980’s for several reasons: drinking in moderation is proven healthful, the number of under age drinkers would be lowered, and if people can go to war and defend our country, then our country should allow them to consume alcohol. A study shows that drinking in moderation is healthful, and can also make a person more enjoyable.
In some cases that is 100% true. However it’s not fair to the responsible 18 year olds that are in the military, going to school, employed, pursuing their dreams, or even just working to save money for the future to have that adult right taken away. You are even allowed to get married at 18, how are you suppose to toast too a long life of happiness? It is only right for the drinking age to be lowered to 18. The legal drinking age is 21, but if you can vote, adopt children, go to war and become a pilot at 18, you should be able to have a drink.
If the age was lowered, the cops would have a lot less on their hands and could stop dealing with underage intoxicated kids all night and focus on more important issues. Also, lowering the drinking age would mean that freshmen and sophomores in college would be able to buy their own alcohol, instead of using risky means to come by it. Some people argue that lowering the drinking age to eighteen, it would cause kids to start drinking even younger. While this is a possibility, it is not nearly as likely for fifteen year olds to start drinking three years from when they’re legal, because they still live at home. If the drinking age varied from state to state kids from nearby states would go to the lowered drinking age states to drink which would cause more accidents.
However many of them had opinions, but no facts to back it up. I realize that many people under the age of 21 cannot handle alcohol. I believe that at the age of 18 you should be able to consume, and purchase alcohol. If you’re able to smoke cigarettes or fight for your country there is no reason why you shouldn’t be able to drink. Substance abuse is a huge factor, but that is the choice the user made.