It also restricts or prohibits the use of certain evidence in sexual offense cases. Conclusion It is important to know the terminology of research in criminal justice because you will have to read reports and if you do not understand what is being written you cannot effectively do your job. Effective research can assist with opening or closing of cases. Using incorrect terms or incorrect information in research can be harmful to the outcome of the question or situation at hand. The credibility of evidence relies often on the handlers, examiners, experts and presenters.
Lacking proper terminology while conducting criminal justice research can be very detrimental to a person’s work, advancement, and career. When an individual is evaluating and analyzing research studies, knowing the terminology associated, will make it easier to complete. Within the research process there are many steps to be completed to be successful. In a criminal justice career some general steps in research are problem formulation, research design, data collection methods, analysis, and presentation of findings, and conclusions, interpretations, and limitations (Hagan, p. 19). Some of the new terminologies obtained from studies in the criminal justice profession are terms such as “Research shock, researchese, concepts, operationalization, dependent and independent variables, theories, and hypothesis (Hagan, p. 15).
How can not knowing the proper terminology affect you as you conduct criminal justice research? If there is a misunderstanding of previous research, the results could reflect on an officers daily duties; such as, incident reports, investigations, negotiations, interviews, and interrogations. Researchese is a language of research that includes concepts and variables to represent operationalization and hypotheses in research. * If common terminology is not understood completely, it would be difficult to understand data collection regardless of how it was collected. To both understand research and conduct new research is it vital that each person involved understands the terminology associated with research and research techniques.
There are chosen according to the type of research and data the social researcher hopes to find. Each can influence the data and research design in different ways. In this essay, I will explore the advantages and disadvantages of using Qualitative and Quantitative data to research Class and Crime. Using Qualitative data to investigate class allows you to conduct in-depth interviews with the respondent collecting the indicuals perspectivies and expeirneces. For e.g.
173 Reflective Journal. Week 1: Aims of the criminal Justice system This week was essentially an introductory topic and provided me with a basic understanding of the aims and operations of the criminal justice system. I learned that there is a number of different steps within the criminal justice system and the involvement of all the parties involved such as police, judge and jury and the defence. According to John Champion the main purpose of the criminal justice system is to process and prosecute individuals who commit crimes against society and to deal out suitable punishments for these individuals. This is a pivotal part in terms of maintain the functioning of society and to ensure that people don’t go around breaking laws wherever and whenever they want.
It can depend on the investigation being held, the place and the difficulty of being able to solve the case. The investigator mindset is to find out why the crime happen, how it could’ve been prevented, and also investigate all the evidence that was found. These concepts can associate with the optimal mindset of an investigator manifest by how much the investigator knows, how much training the investigators has, and the experience that the investigator already has. The more training and
Current and Future Technologies used in the criminal Justice system AJA 363 Current and Future Technologies used in the criminal Justice system Communication skills are the most important skills that are necessary for law enforcement professionals to succeed in this type of profession. Law enforcement officers must understand this reality and being effective at communicating will make the job easier. If an officer decides to be a lousy communicator the results usually end up being poor interpersonal relationships, citizen’s complaints, and in the worse case, possibly even injury or death in the streets. The Webster’s dictionary defines communication as “an act of transmitting a message, exchange of information, to make known.” (Lt. J, Glennon 2007, policeone.com) Communication for public safety is still far behind commercial users in communications functionality, even though there have be improvements that have achieved much better interoperability between different disciplines and across jurisdictional boundaries, lack of governance, standards, and training continue to be the biggest gaps, but this is not for lack of technology. There are technical solutions out there that are ready to help law enforcement communicate effectively and efficiently.
We are going to describe each of these psychologists and we are going to discuss the roles that they play within the criminal justice field. A basic scientist “pursues knowledge for its own sake.” (Green, 2011). These basic scientists study for the satisfaction of understanding the law and contributing to scientific advances within the law. Applied Scientists are “dedicated to applying knowledge to solve real-life problems.” (Greene, 2011). Many times
This research forms the foundation for understanding, explanation, prediction, prevention and criminal justice policy. What makes criminology a science is the emphasis on testable hypotheses. Its support or refutation through empirical research forms the basis of what is accepted among scientific criminologists as valid knowledge (M.Lanier & Henry, 2009). Law- making, law- breaking and law- enforcing Criminology has historically
This research has a potential to thoroughly investigate issues concerning psychology, sociology, anthropology and other subjects. In its questioning, it does not hesitate to expose even the negative aspects of the researched area. Hence critical research does not focus only on finding out about the negatives, but also asks questions which are aimed at finding out the positives. In order to define critical research clearly and to understand the reason for it to be described as ‘scientific’, the characteristics of science are discussed with reference to the three of the main traditions of media research in this assignment. The main three traditions which are used in this assignment are, ‘media effects, cultural