Representative Democracy Essay

996 Words4 Pages
Option 1: a bicameral, separation of powers form of representative democracy in a federal system A mob can be defined as “a crowd bent on or engaged in lawless activity”, it can also be looked at as “the common people, the masses; the populace”. What happens when you put the masses in control of writing there own acts of laws or legislation? Sooner or later they become the original definition “a disorderly crowd of people”. There was a reason the original founding fathers chose to use the separation of powers, to leave the power in one groups hand be that the masses or the judges there is no one to check them. We’ve learned from mistakes in the past that leaving branches unchecked lead to corruption and other deep seeded problems. For the past two hundred years the United States government has had arguably tactical system of enacting laws. Representatives from the two houses of government make up the voting population who are looked to pass a pieces of legislation by gaining 2/3 of the majority vote from each house who debate and come to a compromise to send to the president throughout a series of events. Despite its strong history Bicameralism now has a disputed rival from the states in the form of these Initiatives. An initiative is the “process that permits voters to put legislative measure directly on the ballot”. David Broder who has stated he is against the initiative system as a whole does happen upon the idea that initiatives would in fact be a simplistic and efficient alternate to the current bicameral system. The initiative can be viewed as an example of direct democracy, something the Constitution wasn’t really written to act in accordance with. The idea of the direct democracy favors the individuals and is true when the majority of the population participates directly in either holding office or making policy. Our bicameral legislative system
Open Document