Rendell Company Essay

586 Words3 Pages
Case 1 RENDELL COMPANY Mr Bevins, a controller of Rendell Company, foresaw increasing difficulties to implement company’s modern control techniques because of the current relationship between the divisional controller and the corporate controller. He believes that information regarding the divisions’ performance are not reported accurately and biased. After visiting the Martex Company, Mr Bevins thinks that by applying a control organization structure similar to Martex will resolve the role conflict between the corporate controllers and the divisional controllers. Problem How should Rendell Company solve the relationship between divisional controller and corporate controller to achieve goal congruence? Should Rendell Company change its control organization structure similar to The Martex Company’s? Reason Currently, Rendell Company use dotted line relationship where divisional controller reports directly to Division Manager. The relationship makes divisional controllers more loyal to the divisional managers not with corporate controller. It makes role conflict between corporate controller and divisional controller. But if Rendell Company directly change into Martex Company’s structure, it needs to make many changes including organizational behaviour that can jeopardize the relationship and trust between divisional controller and divisional managers that had been built very well until now. This situation can influence the process to achieve company’s goal. Case Evidence 1. Rendell Company had seven operating divisions and profitable for over 50 years. In the late 1970s its rate of growth slowed considerably. 2. The corporate controller specified the accounting system to which the division were expected to conform and the general procedures to follow in connection with budgeting and reporting performance. 3. In Rendell Company, budget and performance reports

More about Rendell Company Essay

Open Document