Religion and Sociology

861 Words4 Pages
Although not everyone in the United States shares the same religious beliefs, religion plays a big part in society. Just as there are many different variations of religious beliefs, however, there are also many different sociological theories to explain the relationship between society and its aspects. Some sociologists view the world as a stable and ongoing being, while others see society as many groups battling some sort of conflict. Even more, there are some sociologists who are more interested in routine interactions between individuals that are seen from day to day (Schaefer, 2011). These three different perspectives are the functionalist, conflict, and interactionist perspectives, and are the most commonly used views by sociologists. These three concepts can be used to explain the sociological effects religion can hold. Functionalists tend to view society as a living organism, in the sense that all aspects of society contribute to its survival. The functionalist perspective emphasizes the importance of the way parts of society are structured to maintain the stability (Schaefer, 2011). Religion for a functionalist would be viewed as more of a reinforcement for the values that society holds. One thing almost all religions have in common is the lesson of being “good”, to treat others how you would want to be treated. It also gives people something to turn to when they feel lost, or something to blame when life is not going the way the would like. Religion holds people together in many ways, offering stability to society. Religion does, however hold both manifest and latent functions. In Sociology: A Brief Introduction, Richard Schaefer defines manifest functions as those that are open, stated, and conscious. Latent functions, however, are unconscious of unintended functions. These functions may also reflect hidden purposes of a specific
Open Document