The Board of Education wants the best for students by closing schools, a lot can’t be accomplished by establishing closures across the country. A different approach must be met to help the education system. The budget crisis represents that the world of capitalism will do anything to find money by raiding the public education in pursuit of profit. With a proof of databases of students failing conducted by the Board of Ed., and schools lacking performance, gives the public facts of school
Shutting down libraries may help bring some funds back to our countries but in return children are losing their freedom of reading. According to Moore, kids “ are also being kept from developing the information skills they need to keep up in workplaces that are increasingly dependent on rapidly changing information.” [2]It is not fair that our children have to suffer because of unnecessary debts. Our
This can affect their education as they will not want to stay on in further education, as they can get a job and make money straight away. ), and Present-time orientation (The w/c believe that you should savour every day, as tomorrow may never come. With this frame of mind, they may think education is a waste of time, as it may not benefit you if tomorrow never comes.) These two sociologists’ theories and practices prove that there are major differences in achievement between classes. However, these theories stereotype, and blame the family too much.
Vulnerable mothers that do not finish getting their education become discouraged and loose the motivation and drive to tackle the oncoming challenges that life brings, creating for them another barrier on the micro level; it being a financial barrier. “Poverty and economic loss diminish the capacity for supportive, consistent, and involved parenting and render parents more vulnerable to the debilitating effects of negative life events” (Vonnie C. McLoyd, 1990 p.311). Not being financially stable brings on a lot of stress that impacts the relationship between the mother and child. Education has a large impact on a person’s life and it can change it for the better.
Laura Lefkowits, in her article From Equity to Adequacy adds... “An important first step for education leaders and policymakers is to help their communities define not only what they want students to know and be able to do, but also how much they are willing to pay to achieve these goals.” How much are we willing to pay? The bottom line is really the front line. When schools struggle to keep books on shelves, struggle to attract and maintain quality staff, while simultaneously fighting off censure and upheaval due to poor historical performance, all in a dilapidated building with overcrowding issues, it is impossible to consistently have adequate outcomes much less high ones. These factors, when interpreted by an ever wisening populous, become a catalyst for the neighborhood’s ambivalence toward the school’s stated mission. So pervasive does this ambivalence become that citizens turn away from the idea of classical education as a real means of upward mobility.
If you are not from a certain class then your opinions do not matter and will not be heard. As silly as this may sound I have even seen cases where it is “who you know and who you don’t” that make a difference. These cases may seem petty and little but they hinder our communication process greatly and cause many problems in our workforce. In return from the problems this is causing it is also giving our local system a bad name and our parents are hearing these rumors and issues and deciding to take their children out of our systems and taking them to other schools causing our program to lose funding by the
In the minds of many people the government’s attempts in recent years to reform education in the United States is viewed as a calculated move toward creation of easily influenced individuals that are useful to the government not necessarily encouraging independent and innovative thinkers. For this reason, some feel that a separation of state and school, much like church and state, would be appropriate. They feel government interference will do more harm than good for the students and families of the United
The low graduation rate is not good for my community because it will lead to increase in the degree of unemployment and this may trigger the rate of crime. Every person desires a safe and secure environment, an environment where its inhabitants enjoy numerous economic benefits. Hence, I would address the unequal allocation of resources and discrimination in district schools because by addressing this inequality, I will be creating not only an educated community but also reduced crime
In recent years the American government has been cutting funding from America’s education system and making it harder for schools to afford the resources they need to provide our students with the proper schooling. John Borowski, an experienced teacher, states that schools and their educators now have to struggle with “inadequate budgets and overcrowded classes” as well as the innate difficulty of teaching subjects most students do not even care about (Borowski). It takes quite a bit of effort to capture one’s attention, especially in terms of academic subjects, so capturing the attention of an entire nation of students requires hard work as well as funding that our schools simply do not have. In Michael Moore’s article “Idiot Nation” Moore explains how schools counteract this dilemma. They make use of all the help they can get, and currently it seems the only group in America that is not just sitting around calling our nation stupid and playing the blame game is corporate America (Moore 139).
The stingy, exclusive, and stigmatizing character of welfare in the United States is the product of successive and increasingly powerful waves of welfare cutbacks. In effort to overhaul government programs, many activists and politicians need to promote a second “New Deal”. Specifically to address the needs of poor single mothers who struggle to find work, make ends meet and take care of their children so they are not so isolated (Reese, 204). The goals of the ‘New Deal’ would be to increase access to jobs, education and training; to help workers make ends meet and balance their obligations to work and family (Reese,