Reflection On Academic Discourse

1860 Words8 Pages
The effects of transparency in a market on the financial crisis Maastricht University School of Business and Economics Maastricht, 23 January 2012 Nicolas Münzer, NM; Kevin Leurs, KMM; Max van Zoest, MCJ ID numbers: i6039536; i6039559; i6042051 Studies: International Business; Economics; Econometrics Course code: EBS1508 Group number: 5D Tutor’s name: C. Bach Writing Assignment: Reflections Paper 1. Introduction Seven hundred billion dollars, that is the price the American Senate paid for the bailout bill on 3rd October 2008. The velocity and magnitude of the financial crisis in 2008 is unique. All this has been triggered by banks and hedge funds, seeking for short-term profits and driven by greed, trading with abstruse derivatives of which an average citizen has never have heard of before. High risky mortgage bonds and insurances have been put together and sold as packages. Oversimplified and shortsighted the risks of those packages have been valued incorrectly. The volume of the so-called credit default swaps and collateralized debt obligation market exploded. Banks traded these derivatives among each other, leading to an opaque mesh of toxic assets. The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, a US-based investment bank, built the peak of the financial crisis (Amadeo, 2012). Months and still years after the peak, the scope of the crisis is inestimable. The mesh of toxic assets has to be scanned piece by piece, revealing the complexity of the financial system. The question arises, how can such a crisis be prevented in the future? Was it a lack of transparency, which enabled the growth of such a morbid system? This paper examines the impact of non-transparency on the financial crisis in 2008. With help of examples of the major banks, it investigates which role the lack of transparency played and concluding, if more transparency could prevent a future crisis.

More about Reflection On Academic Discourse

Open Document