Reasons for the Opposition Against the Occupy Central Movement

564 Words3 Pages
Opposition against the Occupy Central Movement was a widespread thought in Hong Kong. A survey found that “Fifty-nine per cent of Hongkongers oppose the Occupy Central campaign being planned by democracy activists and about 58 per cent fear it might damage the economy.” (Ng Kang-chung, 2014) In addition, the argument over achieving universal suffrage in Hong Kong though civil disobedience has been debated relentlessly in Hong Kong. The reasons why people attempt to oppose Occupy Central Movement can be divided into several concerns, including social, legal and economical. Perspectives towards Occupy Central Movement may vary according to different social concerns. The opinion of the pro-establishment Liberal Party leader James Tien (2013) is that the movement will be interpreted as social disorder by the international community and will put off investors. He pointed out that the social movement involved occupying or blocking public places and it may trouble the drivers of taxis and minivans and cause traffic congestions which may affect the daily lives and the safety of the general public. On the contrary, there are some people holding the supportive stance toward the Occupy Central Movement. They claimed that the movement is an act to force the government to follow the Basic Law to give the general public the freedom to elect the representative of the city since freedom is one of the core values of Hong Kong. Although it is hard to justify the movement as right or wrong, it does help protect Hong Kong people’s freedom. (Fong Kei Hou, 2013) Civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws as a peaceful form of political protest. The idea of it is to amass public sympathy to force the government to satisfy the dissenters'
Open Document