The primarily reason is the job-related because with all the unemployment and high taxes, people moved to look for a better job under stable circumstances. If Puerto Rico hadn’t raise their taxes, many Puerto Ricans wouldn’t have leaved the island, but it all comes back to the United States limiting Puerto Rico in trading with other countries. Also, this mass emigration was caused by the indecisiveness of the political status of Puerto Rico. During the years, there have been various status referendums deciding on whether Puerto Rico should become a state, independent, or stay the way it is. And in these referendums, the Puerto Ricans don’t seem to agree on the status of Puerto Rico.
Immigration The poverty in other parts of Latin America forces people to look elsewhere for jobs. The proximity to the United States makes it easier for the poor of Latin American to migrate legally or “illegally” to the United States. It is difficult to estimate the exact number of undocumented from Latin America. It is estimated that it numbers over 10 million. Conclusion In the interest of time, people have limited myself to addressing select issues that are affecting the quality of life of Hispanics in the U.S.
Some Americans do not understand the true reason why they tend to choose our country to start over in. Immigrants constantly face discrimination because of the color of their skin, the sound of their voices or simply because of the way they look and their beliefs. Instead of discriminating, we should as a whole, welcome them with open arms and try to establish equality with immigrants. Over the past four decades, America has been challenged by a massive flow of immigrants, particularly from Asia and Latin America. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, foreign born people compose about 10 percent of the nation’s population.
With a degree from these types of colleges a graduate usually will make their way into upper echelon of the United States workforce. However, Asian Americans only hold less than two percent of top corporate jobs. The average income of an Asian American in the year of 2009 was approximately $68,780, which is the highest among all race groups. However, the poverty rate of Asians in 2009 was up to 12.5 percent from 10.6 percent in 2007. Researchers, supported by Deloitte, Goldman Sachs, Pfizer and Time Warner, conducted 2,952 surveys of working-aged men and women and gathered qualitative and quantitative data to conclude that many Asian-Americans, whether immigrant or native born, find it hard to "fit in" the upper management ranks.
Since the 1980s, the United States, Canada and Australia have set up privileged entry systems to attract entrepreneurs, executives, scientists, professionals and technical specialists. More recently, Western European and some East Asian countries have followed suit (Findlay, 1995). Attracting Indian IT professionals has become a global competition, while the health services of countries like Britain could not run without doctors and nurses from Africa and Asia. This type of migration can represent a 'brain drain' - that is a transfer of human capital from poor to rich countries - but may also bring about technology transfer and cultural innovation for areas of origin. Since poor countries continue to turn out more graduates than they can employ, while rich countries continue to prune their education budgets, such migration looks certain to grow (Findlay,
In the past ten years, however, Latino migrants have settled and integrated into more areas that have had previously only a small number of immigrants. As a result, changing the work economy and reducing work wages for both U.S. residents and Latinos thus creating a negative attitude and punishing immigrants who work hard and “taking jobs away from” Americans. Ironically, however, most of the wages earned by Latino immigrants are reinvested back into the economy, despite the notion that income is also sent back to their home countries, (The Hispanic Challenge? What We Know About Latino Immigration). Additionally, the social demographics of this group are important because they serve as vital implications for public policy.
It means the nation's nannies, elder care, health care and transportation workers, and those at cleaning companies. Large corporations including Sun Microsystems, Microsoft, Oracle, and Intel have testified to the need for more skilled foreign labor. These corporations have argued that each new programming job filled in the US results in at least another two domestic jobs in sales and marketing. But as the US government has dragged its heels, allowing only a few "Band-Aid" amendments to US immigration policy in regard to the H-1B visas needed by high-tech workers, the jobs have increasingly flowed
Research shows that between 40 and 50 percent of wage loss among low skilled Americans is due to the immigration of low skilled workers. Some native workers lose not just wages but their jobs through immigrant competition. An estimated 1,880,000 American workers are displaced from their jobs every year by immigration. (Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform) 71% of respondents in a 2006 Quinnipiac University Poll believed that enforcement of immigration laws would require additional measures beyond a border fence, with 65% of
(source 5) Very few came with the sole purpose of starting a company. instead, immigration is predicted to leave American workers better off. This has been concluded by the the Congressional Budget Office, which issued a report concluding that the immigration bill would add six million workers to the American job market by 2023 and nine million by 2033 – increasing the labor force by 5 percent. (Congressional budget office, source
Since then America has forgotten the huge role immigration has played throughout history and the contribution it led to the development of America, as well. U.S immigration has brought upon the debate for the future of American jobs, impacts, and benefits. Statistics demonstrate that immigration has helped the United States with employment by adding jobs and bringing in more tax payers adding a positive effect on the United States. Before the recession, when the economy was expanding (2000-2007), 60 percent of the net increase in employment among the working-age went to immigrants. Even though they accounted for just 38 percent of the population, immigrants still took majority of the jobs in the United States (Camarota, Zeigler).