Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the strengths and limitations of questionnaires for the study of parental attitudes to education.  Firstly, the item claims ‘sociologists are interested in what these attitudes are and how they affect achievement.’ For sociologists, particularly positivists, questionnaires have many strengths that warrant them a useful research method when studying parental attitudes. However, for interpretivists the limitations of this method make it fairly useless as complex issues like this one require deep and meaningful studies. This essay will assess these strengths and weaknesses to conclude the suitability of the use of questionnaires when studying parental attitudes to education. One of the major strengths of questionnaires is their practicality.
This story shows that it really doesn’t take much to motivate and inspire a child. We having the luxury of education need to be more diligent in encouraging our children to be educated and useful members of society. We must also teach them tolerance because not all people have had the opportunities that we have had. In my life experience I believe that many things like racism, sexism, and many other intolerant behaviors would disappear. Hate would be a thing of the past our children is where this must start, raising our kids with tolerance will make the future a better
Most parents are happy for there children to be observed, although they would not want any other parents or people who have no involvement with the child to read any reports. This means you must not leave any notes or records lying around where others might find them. You should always make sure that you put any children’s observations away carefully, When discussing a child make sure that you are only doing so with other colleagues and other professionals who
In fact there is rare evidence that the opposite is true. However, this does not seem so important for 2 reasons. First, no one is really doing anything huge about it besides, some schools have already started to encourage educators who are musicians but to do not teach music at their schools, to volunteer their time to guide students to becoming involved with music and art. Secondly, much of the research which encompasses a different viewpoint than the creative arts is more useful than math, seems to lean more towards drawing a connection between the creative arts and other subjects, showing that the creative arts do make students smarter but that it is still more important to be good in all other subjects as well. The article titled , “Does Music Make You Smarter?”, which was published in Music Educators Journal brings up some important information regarding the problem.
It’s beneficial as there are male and female role models available for the children, and it gives the parents more control of how their children are brought up. Another strength is that there’s less interference from wider family members however this can also be seen as a negative aspect, as other people are unaware of what’s happening and if there was any problems within the family and therefore it’s difficult to identify neglect. This also makes it difficult to seek professional help outside of the family. Another disadvantage of this privatised nuclear family is that children are only exposed to one set of values and so are influenced to become like their parents in the future as they have no exposure to other behaviours of different families. A criticism of this
Avoiding all risks and challenge would result in a very timid adult lacking in many everyday skills and abilities. It would be very easy to respond to all risks to which children are exposed by not allowing them to explore or experiment. Children need to explore their environment – it is one of the ways in which they learn – but it needs to be a ‘safe’ environment where risk is controlled by adults. It is important that children are given the freedom to develop their skills, with adult support but not too much intervention. Understanding the stage of development a child is at and their individual needs can help you to provide the right amount of risk in activities, for example children under the age of 8 cannot safely judge the speed or distance of a car on the road, so a child under the age of 8 should never be allowed to cross the road alone.
A criminal or potential criminal will not volunteer this information willingly. This also falls into a civil matter where one does not have to provide personal information because it is a violation of one’s privacy, according to the Constitution. The chances of an identifier being incorrect are almost zero because each person has a distinct value or trait, making it hard to deny. Finger- printing and hand scans are accurate and distinct and require very little computer space this also provides access for many law enforcement officers to deal with unresolved case. Retina or iris scans are high in accuracy for identifying a person but is not commonly used among identifying criminals.
Censorship certainly helps those who might think it is inappropriate to display information. Parents might feel that their children have a certain age to experience or know the information. Canada is indeed a free country but that does not mean that people have the right to promote and express their views that might be offensive to others. Censoring indecent and obscene information is an important role of government.
What Age Do You Give Your Child a Cell Phone? Giving a child a cell phone has great implications that parent’s don’t often realize. Delaying giving a cell phone for as long as you can is good path to follow and waiting until the child is at least in middle school is an even a better choice. There is the obvious consideration of cost, which really doesn’t require further discussion. More importantly, parents should consider three main factors: cell phones aren’t toys, they are a distraction, and they must be used properly.
Like the mother, permissive parents often tend to rarely enforce rules or discipline their children. The Permissive Parenting Style is an extremely relaxed approach where parents are generally warm, nurturing and affectionate. However, they are overly accepting of their children's behaviour, good or bad (Positive Parenting Centre). Children often get to make their own decisions and don’t have to live up to any expectations. Parents with this style take on the role of "friends” rather than parents.