He also believed that different interviews are used for different purposes. Research through interview attains information and understanding of issues which are relevant to specific questions of a research project. Arkskey 1999 et al.... believed that one of the great strengths of using interviews for research is that it takes many different approaches. Structured interviews are when a researcher asks questions which are set in advance. A disadvantage to this will be that the researchers may be biased as they will already have a set of questions therefore likely to gain expected answers.
Qualitative and Quantitative research methods are used to create research reports. They are two different ways of collecting data, so the reports can be prepared efficiently and effectively. They both have their own ways of collecting data and information, and they both have advantages and disadvantages Many people are not aware of the two types of research, Qualitative and Quantitative; they are both very important if you want to write a proper report. The purpose of this report is to compare the two methods of research. The report will discuss the differences between the two types of research and also the advantages and disadvantages of each.
It is expected that these skills will be developed through use of the core practicals and are closely linked to the requirements of ‘How Science Works’ criteria. Examiners and moderators therefore placed particular emphasis on seeking evidence of these skills in candidates’ reports. It was disappointing to see that evidence for a number of these skills was frequently absent from reports. The most common omissions were; • • Assessment of practical skills (b)(ii) – ‘Identifies and explains possible systematic or random errors in results.’ Analyse and interpret data to provide evidence, recognising correlations and causal relationships (using descriptive statistics such as standard deviation and discussing the problems of correlation and causation as illustrated in Unit
Using this particular method is known as qualitative research because it is aimed at a specific group or target. In this method, researchers know in advance what is expected and the design emerges as the study continues. Qualitative research produces more abundant information, although it is more time consuming participants are given the chance to do in-depth interviews. Conducting interviews in this manner creates some ethical issues such as the legal validity of contract. In order to participate in any type of study individuals must be informed of the purpose, the risks, and what is expected from the target group.
Qualitative research is used in business research, market research and even scientific research. This type of research often focuses on broad or broader topics and the information is often biased because in many cases the collected data involves opinions and feelings or actions. Qualitative research also involves the investigator or researchers involvement in some way. The researcher or investigator is usually directly involves with the collection of data (i.e. : conducting interviews, surveys, leading the focus, etc.)
These stages must be followed in the proper order for the policy to be completed properly and successful. The stages have a direct impact on one another and are typically referred to as a cycle. When the policy is being evaluated, it may reveal issues within the policy that need to be addressed. Each of these stages will need to be repeated and reviewed. This will ensure that errors and mistakes are reduced or eliminated when implementing policy.
The social work profession has always been at the frontline of several of the most interesting and innovative ideas in anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practices because of anti-discriminatory practice being of crucial importance in social work education and practice. The term ‘anti-discriminatory practice’ is regularly used when describing forms of practice that dispute the challenges of discrimination and oppression. However, Phillipson (1992) outlines a distinction between anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice, leading to a more legalistic approach to inequality. Okitikpi and Aymer express that anti-discriminatory practice is ‘the judicious integration of epistemology, ontology and methodology’ (p30), and go on to explain how principle, skills, knowledge and understanding are required for anti-discriminatory practice, which are contained in the body of social work teaching and practice. Anti-discriminatory practices have to grapple with theoretical difficulties and have to make sense of and work with competing values and belief systems.
In causal comparative research, the researcher has limited control over the study and extreme caution must be applied in interpreting results. This is because the groups are already formed at the beginning of the study. An apparent cause-effect relation may not be as it appears. The alleged cause of an observed effect may in fact be the effect itself, or, a third variable may have caused both the apparent cause and the effect. In other words, an observed relationship between variable A and B can mean that A causes B, B causes B, or a third variable C causes both A and
If you simply want to take a look into the behaviors of individuals then you will want to use qualitative research methodology. However, if you want to look at the statistics or percentage aspects of a situation then it is important that you use the quantitative research methodology. Mixed method research is actually where the use of quantitative and qualitative research method is both being used together to conduct a research and using both forms of data to come to a conclusion. It is appropriate to use both if a researcher wants to look at an issue in a 360 degree manor meaning they would like to see how many people the issue is actually affecting, as well as why it is affecting them. Scientifically sound research actually supports the function of a human service manager because the results or findings of this research is often backed up and proved successful by science laws, as well as being backed up by facts.
Rigor and control of extraneous variables allow researchers to establish a cause-effect relationships testing casual relationships (Polit and Beck, 2012).Experimental designs strengths are that a researcher gains first hand knowledge based on the use of actual tests and trials. The weaknesses are that outcomes may not be the most desirable and may be cause for a major effect up to the death of a patient. There is also the subject of ethics, how much exposure to experimental research is considered enough or is justified. Nonexperimental design Arnold (1997) comes in many forms and generally refers to research that does not employ randomization and control groups (p.44) .This is a non intrusive way to research. Based on actual fact and findings one can discover the actual results needed.