Company Q currently does not seem to be as socially responsible as it could be. It has recently closed a couple of stores in a higher-crime-rate area, because the stores were supposedly losing money. It has also chosen not to donate outdated products to the local food bank because it fears employees may steal food, claiming that the food is for donating to the food bank. In evaluating Company Q’s current attitude toward social responsibility, I found them to be lacking in some areas that might help boost the companies ability to have a more cohesive ethical culture with in the company and therefore be able to retain more revenues as a result. The first action that Company Q could take to improve its attitude toward social responsibility would be to donate the outdated food to the local food bank.
You will read in the essay the pros and cons of the welfare policy and how affective the policy is today for people. The welfare policy has a few programs and different policy that are run local and state. The welfare is made for the poor and the disabled, the government gives them cash benefits
This also includes the affordability range, and it stops unnecessary consumption, limits price growth to avoid excess societal burden. Government intervention varies with low- income developing countries to industrialized countries. In low income developing country, government’s focus is “how to improve access to their people”, whereas in industrialized nations direct some of their focus on cost-containment. Subsequently, government intervention also faces imperfections. It becomes complicated due to political manipulations.
In the old poor law going into a work house was for the able bodied poor and outdoor relief was for the incompetent poor, the amount of money being given out was tried to be minimised. It was also seen as being inefficient as people such as Thomas Malthus and David Ricardo noticed that many people became too reliant upon the poor law and handouts, they started to lose independence and didn't see the point in working hard when they could just receive money from the poor rate system. If people didn't receive enough money in their wages to cover the costs for basic needs such as food, their wages would be 'topped' up, allowing them to be able to afford the necessities. However in some ways the way in
Assess the impact of state policies and laws on family life. Initially, the government’s aim of state policies and laws was to help and support family life, especially those families who are struggling the most. Some sociologists like functionalists argue that state policies and laws are good as they help the family perform its functions. Others like Marxists and Feminists say that state policies and laws are a bad impact on family life because they help a bad society develop. The New Right also believe that they only encourage diversity in family types and therefore are bad for society.
In “What is Poverty?” Theodore Dalrymple argues that poverty has been redefined. In traditional poverty, poor people’s income levels are low, they are starving, or the medical care is not enough. However, this kind of poverty does not exist in industrial countries like England because of the welfare state. The welfare state redistributes wealth, provides free medical care and free houses for the poor. According to the author, this causes moral poverty.
Some of these programs are SNAP(food stamps), government provided health care, utility assistance, and even checks from the government to help pay for your children. These are government expenses that could be reduced because they are often times abused in modern society. Limitation on having more children will cut government spending, reduce children born into low quality situations, and reduce teenage pregnancy chains. Government programs, such as food assistance and health care, can be very expensive, especially when more people are receiving it then paying taxes to fund them. Children of families that receive government assistance are more likely to have children as teenagers and are in turn are more likely to receive more government assistance because they are not financially stable.
Assignment 2: Poverty and Pollution Case Study Bus 309 June 02, 2013 Beverley Carey Determine the ethical implications of businesses polluting in a third world country. Professor Summers argues that the bank should migrate of dirty, polluting industries to go the poorest countries. His implication is inhuman, Just because the countries has a lower cost of living doesn’t give them the right to go a polluted them. The Third World refers to the poorer and undeveloped countries of the world. Repeatedly, these countries have enormously poor ecological situations.
Except my poor judgment was not to give the homeless change because I was either scared or thought the money would not be put into good use. People are also aware of starvation being an issue in several different countries. However, they are more concerned about purchasing the latest brand names of clothing. On television there are many infomercials about poverty in different countries and kids who are malnourished. The organizations that post the commercials, ask that we donate a dollar a day so that a young boy or girl can have proper meals and a shelter over their head, but we
Pollution is unrestricted. The government does not address countless other environmental problems in their country. Usually, creating and enforcing environmental regulations would be economically disastrous for a poor country. The poor people in these Third World Countries are forced to choose between buying food for their family to eat or living in a clean, healthy environment. Since they are poor, they have to choose food for their family to eat.