I believe the Constitution did a better job of protecting liberties, specifically in the areas of the federal court system, representation of the people, and the levy of taxes. Alexander Hamilton, statesman and economist, proclaimed "Laws are a dead letter without courts to expound and define their true meaning and operation”. The Articles of Confederation which gave rise to the Confederation government that took effect in March 1781, did not give the national government any means to enforce the federal laws. The states could, and often did, choose to interpret or enforce federal laws in any manner they saw fit. This led to disputes amongst the states that could not be readily settled, as it relied on each state’s court system which invariably chose to discount the ruling of the other states.
Some wanted republicanism gone so that would get rid of the monarch. The Real Whigs were constantly warning the people to guard themselves from the government taking their liberty and seizing their property. John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon wrote that political power is to always to be feared. They wrote a series called Cato’s letters. It exercised to prevent the ruler’s attempt to corrupt and oppress people.
They stressed that the newly created form of central government did not threaten the states’ rights. The Anti-Federalists touted the “spirit of ‘76” (Schultz, page 15) in favor of a weaker central government, preservation of states’ rights, strong individual liberties and at the very least a robust bill of rights to protect individual liberties. Ratification stalled as Anti-Federalists from larger states such as Massachusetts, New York and Virginia refused to ratify until a bill of rights for citizens was guaranteed, and Federalists, eager to see the Constitution enacted, resisted lengthy amendments to the Constitution for fear of having to begin writing the entire framework over
Our founding fathers fought for a separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches to avoid conflict and rise of power in one or more branches. In that aspect I believe the government works in a constructive manner to ensure equality between the branches, however, in the matter of working in a constructive manner for the good of the people is less certain. This country is facing an economic crisis and there are members of both parties that would tell the general public they would like the war in Afghanistan and Iraq to come to an end when in reality an economic recovery is the last thing they want to happen in a foreign country. The Republican Party, for example, would have liked to see a higher unemployment rate towards the end of 2012 in hopes of decreasing the chances of the President’s re-election. Higher unemployment rates lead to a more devastating economic crisis resulting in the failure to re-elect a democratic President or more precisely, our current President.
The New World Times How will the constitution affect the presidential elections? In terms of this, the constitution will affect the elections because the federalists and the anti-federalists will oppose to vote for the right representative but because that the representative comes from that class…… the classes will only vote for their representative. This attempt will trouble the nation with election issues and pretty soon… the constitution will be abandoned set America for a monarchy. Editor’s opinion In my opinion the U.S constitution provided more detailed political laws that was able to help out the economy itself to prevent form having a dictatorship. However the constitution first needed to be discussed before being passed out
My name is John Rutledge, a delegate from South Carolina, and I am just one of the many brilliant men that helped create our Constitution. There were five main issues discussed at the Constitutional Convention that drove us crazy, because we wanted to make the most perfect Constitution for the United States of America. Although I cared about all of the issues, there were only a couple of them that I really focused on. For instance we didn’t know who should have the right to vote and who shouldn’t have the right to vote. This issue for me just made me insane, but no matter what, we had to come to an agreement for every issue.
America’s founding fathers penned the Constitution and Bill of Rights to protect America from tyranny, threats, and becoming anything other than the democracy they envisioned. Our societies, as a whole, have become violent in many ways. Everyday there are school shootings, gang related murders, and other violent acts of crime. The question is can the violence be stopped with alterations to our civil rights? Will strict laws limiting our rights to bear arms decrease the violence?
The Founders of the Constitution wanted to create a strong central government but were concern about it having unlimited power as they new it could be dangerous. As James Madison wrote, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition” (1). Once the Constitution was complete it was a government with three branches (Executive, Legislative, Judicial) that were independent of each other but which had checks and balance over the action of the others. In this essay, we will see how Bush has attempted to fight terrorism and some of the checks and balances of the Judicial and Legislative branches that were for and against his policy. On September 11, in 2001, four planes were hijacked by Al Qaeda terrorists and were then used as human missiles again US targets.
The separation of powers is quite pivotal for the US government otherwise there tends to be some corruption relevant to the extreme utilization of powers. Those two points of view are states by James Madison while planning to set up the Constitution of the national government, and those opinions are all crucial to the development of
When America was going to war with Britain no one thought America would win. In Common Sense written by Thomas Paine America was being judged by its size. They did not think America could win because America is much smaller than Britain. America might have been small, but with the determination of freedom they shocked many people who did not believe in them. Way back then, people could not measure the possibility of colonies taking on the world’s largest empire.