First, it will decrease the number of dangerous Catholics. Second, it will give the poor some property. Third, it will increase the nation’s overall wealth, since people will not have to pay for the upkeep of the children. Fourth, the mothers will be free of the burden of bringing up children. Fifth, the new food will be welcomed in taverns and culinary circles.
In addition to providing food for the wealthy and an income for the poor, Swift says that raising children for food will give the Irish economy a substantial boost. The children will be considered delicacies. Delicacies which will be sold as other goods. The author says that the only objection to his proposal will be that the population of Ireland will decrease. On the other hand, he says that reducing the population will make it easier for England to rule over them, so it can be considered a benefit for the English.
The foodways in America and around the world have drastically changed in the last couple centuries. While some of these changes have had a negative effect on food pathways, many of the changes have made food production more efficient and inexpensive. Five significant changes to the foodways have been the invention of the refrigerated railroad car, the disappearance of the milkman, the microwave, mechanically separated chicken, and genetically modified seeds. One of the most important inventions in the transportation of food is the refrigerated railroad car. This advancement has allowed consumers to receive fresh food and beverages from distant locations without the fear of spoilage.
This map would be useful to answering the question because it would display the negative effects of the Green Revolution visually and let me accurately compare the different regions and see where the consequences were worse. Some people would agree that the Green Revolution expanded agricultural supply and immensely benefitted farmers and the society as a whole (Docs 1, 2, 4). The technological advances that came along with the revolution helped with the growth of food production as well as world population by allowing farmers to manufacture an abundance of food suitable for more people. Since 1950, the wheat yields of Mexico and India multiplied about 4 times as much as the Green Revolution progressed (Doc 1). Because the Food and Agriculture Organization were the ones who
Then, the surprise was so shocking to read. Swift wanted to nurse young healthy children and make them into a wholesome food by stewing, roasting, baking, or boiling them. This was his way of helping poor people with their problems with their children. He thought by eating children it would help with poverty in Ireland. I realized Swift was a person with serious problems when I started reading about children becoming a wholesome food at a young age.
Children from poor families could be sold into a meat market at the age of one, which would decrease overpopulation and unemployment, sparing families the expense of child-bearing while providing them with a little extra income, improving dining of the wealthy, and contributing to the overall economy. Raising children for food will give the Irish economy a boost. These kids are delicacies, and delicacies can be expensive. The culinary experience will make Ireland a hot spot for tourists. He suggests some recipes for preparing this delicious new meat, and he feels sure that top cooks will be able to generate more.
A “young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food… upon a medium that a child just born will weigh 12 pounds…increased to 28 pounds” were they shall “contribute to the feeding, and partly to the clothing, of many thousands.” (3,2) He compares children of a year old to animals, where they will be used as food and even clothing. The meat of course will be “somewhat dear”, which will be “very proper” for the rich. Swift also “recommends” buying the children alive and “dressing them hot from a knife,” as they do when “roasting pigs”. He also offers that “of the hundred and twenty thousand children already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one-fourth part to be males; which is more than [they] allow sheep, black cattle, or swine.” (3) Here Swift proposes that they use some of the children only for breeding and brings in the fact that it is “more than [they] allow” animals, showing that these lower class children are not much better than swine, cattle, and sheep. The “remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in the sale to the persons of quality and fortune through the kingdom… so as to render them plump and fat for a good table.” (3) He refers to selling the children like they are animals, not caring of how they are treated, only that they are to be eaten
In order to get his readers attention, Swift describes the situation of which his readers are full aware. He describes how that poor of Ireland beg for food and money to fed their families, Swift writes to the wealthy to promote the help the poor need. A solution is proposed that will help the poor gain jobs and other necessities they need. Infants are profitable and easy to come by in the poor community. With the right kind of breeding and nourishment the infants can be sold to the wealthy for meals and other material uses.
The obsession with maximum profit has shaped how we produce, distribute, and consume food (Ritzer 1983, 372). Our current industrial food system is unsustainable because of the capitalistic focus on efficiency, which negatively affects both consumers and producers. The ideals of capitalism, clearly embraced by the fast food industry, have allowed the modern food system to expand and become much more profitable (Schlosser 2001, 6). Emphases on efficiency and technological advancements have led to the success of fast food and the modern industrial food system. This system rewards quantity over quality (Ritzer 1983, 374).
The United States became such a reference place of where to go, that it was soon referred to as the “melting pot.” Immigration can affect politics, economies, and social encounters. It is also very important to keep immigration in mind because it can bring joy and help nations; however, having too many immigrants can have devastating effects. Immigration is good for the world and it should be allowed everywhere. One of the best things immigration brings to the table is the amount of cultural diversity that comes along with it. Without immigration it would be harder to get to know other cultures because the only other way would be through traveling; however, not everyone can afford to travel around the world.