Growth of support for facism was a reason for Mussolinis appointment as Prime Minister,however there were many other reasons for Mussolinis appointment as PM, but growth of support was very important for him. The war and the mutilated victory, had an affect on Mussolinis appointment as PM. The main reason wad that the nationalists were bitterly disappointed that italy didn’t make any gains during the war. The nationalists claimed that Italy had been betrayed by the Liberal government, this shows that the nationalists might have wanted to overthrow the Liberal government and therefore supported Mussolini before he was appointed. This links into the title point that Mussolini had a wide support base and that it was growing.
Using a wide variety of media, that included music, silent films, and radio, propagandists implied hatred for the enemy and support for America's allies. Greater public effort for war production by persuading people to make do with what they had so that more material could be used for the war effort was also
Militarism led to problems because every country had confidence that its new technological weaponry and troop count could defeat any other country, which led to a severe lack of negotiations. And the only way to find out whose military is better, is to fight. Another key factor that played a role in World War I was alliances. Alliances caused them to be more “cocky” towards each other because they knew if they went to war they had someone behind there back. This can be compared to as a domino effect.
In Why Nations Go to War, Dr.John G Stoessinger talks about the role of individuals in starting wars. He is of the view that factors like economics, nationalism, alliance networks and even fate are often put forward as the primary reasons for the outbreak of a war, but the human element, the personalities, the hopes and fears and the particular worldview of the individual leaders of the country are not given nearly as much importance. The writer points out that wars are after all, started by people and to a large extent, the book deals with the lead up to the moment when people finally decide to go to war. The author holds a Ph.D. from Harvard and has taught at Harvard, M.I.T, Columbia and Princeton. He won the Bancroft Prize for his book, The Might of Nations and he has served as acting director for the political affairs division at the United Nations.
Huge propoganda campaign to get people to accept sacrifices people must make. Govt's, businesses put out literature, pictures, posters. Called on patriotic feelings and told people to start being careful Hollywood scripts had to be approved by gov't and were not easily approved. Studios were producing shorts encouraging people to enlist, do their duties, etc Hollywood encouraged their big stars even to get into the military. Jimmy Stewart was a famous actor who made a career of being in the army.
All of his evidence really points to the Indians being good warriors but not getting the appreciation they deserve after the war is over. He does not give much evidence that is against his thesis, everything seems to point back to his thesis. He is very opinionated with the support that he gives for his thesis. Robert S. Allen really uses his evidence very well to support his thesis. He is always giving more evidence stating that the Indians were not being taken care of unless the British needed them for war.
The use of this rhetorical device allows him to establish his main idea subtly, due to the fact that some of the terms he uses, the German people would not understand. As Hitler goes into detail of explaining what he is going to do, he uses various terms that make the Germans believe he is doing well when in fact it is for a horrible crime. “...to conduct humanitarian warfare – that is, to attack only fighting troops.”(Hitler, Adolf). With this use of euphemism, Hitler is able to conceal that he is going to bomb large places but saying he is only attacking the troops that are fighting. This type of euphemism allows him to influence the German people with what their opinion on the issue is going to be.
To Subdue an Enemy Interpretation is a key concept in living a civil lifestyle and governing a civil country. Abraham Lincoln had many interpretations that were objected that directly a country fighting a civil war. These actions, though controversial were key stepping stones in restructuring a nation that had fallen apart. Lincoln, now viewed as the “Great Emancipator”, was not always viewed as so in the eyes of his fellow countrymen. Many of his decisions led to uproar, but one in the end set the ground for the United States as we know it today.
These men fought and used many tools to gain an advantage on England that would help break them away from the country that held them in their grasp. They lived in a Monarchy nation where a King would rule over them without the common man being heard. There came a time where the people of Britain wanted to try and rebel from England. It was not until a few brave men would gather together to start writing letters to their fellow common men that those times started to change. These people of Britain that wanted to break away started to read these motivating and inspiring documents.
the Zapatistas movement offers inspiration for millions because of Their struggle had won the support of many others around the world. on the other hand some people considered the zapatistas rebellion as the new type of warfare another people understood the violence as product of cultural diferences others condidred it to cultural barbarism but most of all this rebellion was the product of the bad condition the indeginous people were facing such as losing their lands and proverty. Their movement showed the world of the importance of the government to recognize the needs of the minor