Their discovery prompted astronomers around the world to look in places where planets were not found to exist and allowed us to further examine how a planet can exist at such extreme temperatures. The methods and thought processes by Mayor and Queloz are essential in
Then Kaku states that force fields can do more than deflecting laser beams because it can levitate objects by the use of magnetic force fields. To support that, he explains that when we place two magnets opposite to each other, the two magnets will repel each other. However he wrote that making force fields and to levitate heavy objects is nearly impossible since we lack advanced technology. For my response, Kaku doesn’t completely explain everything. Suppose that you have a structure on a planet or a spaceship in the middle of nowhere, and suppose you don't want the force field on all the time either because there are times when protection isn't needed.
Because no model represents all aspects of the natural world perfectly * Why is it important for a scientist to understand the limitations of the models they use? If they don't, they will have flawed observations * Choose a specific example of a scientific model and describe Globe * its strengthswhat can it be used to study? it shows where land, water, and mountains are, its shows location * its limitationswhat are some things that it cannot accurately represent? it doesn't represent of high or deep mountains, oceans are. It is not very accurate on the sizes of countries * Define and give an example of each of the following types of scientific
Because there is a lack of answers and explanations that science does not have, it is expectable that the idea of a superior entity would fill that blank. In addition, it is seen in this society that science and religion are opposed to each other and cannot be compatible. However, it is a fact that neither science nor religion can give a proper answer for every inquiry of human existence. Each theory seems to answer the main issue, which is how life has been originated, based on statements taken from their own structure of rules. Because of this, the question of how life is originated continues to be unanswered.
Cunningham I.S 234 Natalie Massry Class 832 May 22 , 2013 Science Project Definition of Collision Particles first have to collide, and only the collisions that have sufficient energy will cause a reaction. For a successful collision to occur the particles must have sufficient energy to pass the activation level. Things that alter reaction rate: Temperature: particles move faster when they have more energy, by moving faster you increase the chance that there will be a collision,
How they used it is still unknown. They also had advanced roads and building that leave current architects and archeologist in owe. With all their great accomplishments it is still a mystery of why everyone left. If life was so advanced why leave the ease of technology for a harder more pain staking life? Was there a drought?
If the quantum dots are placed in the cavity, the spot on the wafers where there are no crystals, in the middle, and capture electrons then the aims of the process are a success. (Hennessey Interview) Kevin explains that you want to then put the process material into devices. This control of powerful light in this small cavity is what causes much speculation. The new devices which use this method are called quantum effect devices. According to Kevin, lasers and lights could be replaced with this technology.
The purpose of pseudoscience is to provide explanation for occurrences or behaviors that are not scientifically proven. Who is to say what is right or wrong? The average human being uses both science and pseudoscience in their everyday life and it is almost vital to produce a balanced, happy life. An example of this is a person who has a belief in a higher power that runs the universe and provides direction in life. This would be considered pseudoscience because there is no physical proof of a higher
Evolution should be taught as a scientific hypothesis. The fact is that most of the time it is just not presented in the proper context, it is taught as a theory without the proper presentation of other “theories”. A little background information as to why the question continues to cause such a stir. In general when we refer to the term "theory" we often mean something that is unproven or an educated guess. Prior to being educated properly we say, "It's just a theory."
While critics could consider this to be a risky choice considering that the average reader is not statistically inclined to comprehend the meaning of numbers, numbers show not only that a significant amount of work was put into the paper but also that the authors have a strong comprehension of the subject at hand. Numbers are known to be those complex ideas because one usually associates a number with identifying or solving a problem. Physicists and Chemists work in the lab to understand how and why the world behaves the way it does and whenever a number is used in quantifying something, the value obviously required a substantial amount of thought or work to produce. In addition to this it takes even more effort to quantify a specific number to a particular subject when the subject is something as complicated as racism. By tying the use of numbers into her argument about racism, Alice makes her ideas more believable simply because numbers convey a kind of indisputable authority.