College is out of the question for a number of households due to no savings. We are in difficult economic times and the financial aid policies are too stiff for families with larger incomes. Colleges need to recognize the latter. The opinion suggests the John Hopkins endowments of nearly $3 billion (“a community committed to sharing values of diversity and inclusion.” The University has billions of dollars and seeks a diverse student body. Does it seek for those who can afford $52,578 year of the few who are both impoverished and qualified.
However, there is no evidence to show that class inequities in educational attainment have shown any trends to decline. Social class background has a powerful influence on the child’s education attainment. For example, middle class families may get most of the places at elite universities, better grades, higher pay rate, and may stay longer in education. One popular theory of class differences in achievement is that richer parents can afford to send their children to private education, where- arguable- their quality of teaching is better than at state school, because they may have the better equipment to explain elaborate ideas, they have smaller classes so there is more teacher-pupil interaction during lesson time. Official statistics shows that 7% of the British children go to private schools, of the 7%, 90% of them go to elite universities, like Oxford, Cambridge.
Kids who realize that education is a way out of their rough financial situation have no other option besides charter schools at times. They are also more expensive, but Guggenheim says that, more than 90% of students from charter schools attend four year universities. This means that they are very effective in preparing students to further their education
They don’t need the pay because they are there on scholarship or other types of pay that is keeping them in the school. At the smaller school they also find money and financial aid packages for them to be able to afford their school. The schools that have more success get rewarded for it. Which helps every school in there conference. “For example, Indiana, which didn't make it to a bowl last season, collected $1.5 million from Big Ten Conference revenue sharing.” (By Steve Wieberg, USA TODAY “Bowl Games Can Prove To Be Costly”) So it wouldn’t be fair to pay athletes because every school doesn’t make
From professors to locations to job seeking it has been a close run. Nevertheless, in the end, it seems the best solution is to attend a community college for two years, then to finish out at a four-year college. This seems to be the most cost efficient way to become a very accomplished individual. This method also involves a low risk factor in case one realizes maybe school is not for them, and after attaining a (fairly easy) Associate’s they can quit while they’re ahead. Since the end goal of both is a degree, and a Bachelor’s is the better form of the two, four-year is the true winner.
The Department of Education’s estimate, called the cost of attendance, which includes living expenses is $25,833 for in-state students and $41,244 for non Ohioans.” (Rabinowitz). Not all student-athletes are on a full ride scholarship, so just by providing them with $3,000 to $4,000 more from the athletic revenue would make a huge difference. People can argue that having a scholarship should be enough because its helping them pay for college and the university doesn’t really owe them anything, but when someone looks at the time and hours spent on the field as well as in the classroom you can see where someone would need the extra money just to get by. It’s not easy being a student-athlete, and adding the stress of having to come up with money just for their living expenses can be stressful. Student-athletes
Kayla Webley from Educational Financing shares her thoughts on the higher education policy, Low-income below poverty students ranging from 18 to 26 are who advertisers search for to bring into their school because of the student loans they will be piled on with. The students who apply to for-profit colleges aren’t aware of why schools are in need to get them to
School also doesn’t start there until the age of seven which is different than here; we usually start at four or five. There is one thing that they do that makes their educational system leaps and bounds above ours, they make college free (Haglund)! Compare that to the United States where you are paying sometimes up to $50,000 a year to attend a prestigious university. This is why our educational system is failing. College is too expensive for the middle-class man to afford.
Coming from my own home my parents didn’t have enough money to put me through a big time college right now and rather than spending fifty thousand a year I’m only spending about two thousand. Also there are financial aid programs that also can help out many others and with a low tuition rate the more people can attend school to receive that higher education. With all of this being said you can tell how important of a role community colleges play in the lives of many. These statements show how community colleges benefit individuals financially and the learning experience they have to offer to
Most complaints to this degree is one of two things: the cost of the child actually going to school and getting the education, or the cost of the programs that have to be put in place to accommodate these children. For the cost of the student, this typically is not very high. Poor Mexican families tend to live in the small, poorer parts of town. This means, in turn, that they are more than likely also attending a school that is lower in quality and price (Martinez 5). While most complain about the bilingual programs being put into school, we have to think about the benefit of this as well.