Determinate sentences involve sentences that have a fixed or flat time (Jirard, 2009). Determinate sentences play a large part in the increasing number of individuals in prison, which, as you can imagine, puts more strain on prisons financially. In the past two decades, we have become increasingly “tough on crime” which has helped to decrease crime to a certain extent. According to an article in the New York Times (2008), the US has fewer than five percent of the entire world’s population, but almost twenty five percent of the world’s prisoners (Liptak & , 2008). The author of the article goes on to say that people in the US are sentenced to do time for crimes that would not produce such a sentence in other countries.
In prior decades, there were few federal crimes and a few criminals sentenced to federal prison but that was changed after the Civil War. The numbers began to grow and then the issues of overcrowding started to occur. As time passed, more institutions were built in several states and began to house offenders on a federal level. The federal was looked at as stricter than the state level. In this day that feeling remains.
However they put him on trail as he looked like the criminal. This case simply summarises why capital punishment should not be brought back to the UK. A man not guilty of a crime or offence was put to death. My last point is that capital punishment is too expensive and imprisonments have their advantages. For example, New York spent about $170 million over 9 years and had no executions  .California could save $1 billion over five years by replacing the death penalty with permanent imprisonment .
It’s my belief that a client should never feel sheltered from fraud/crime to government agencies. 2.) Yes, I do not think there should be a sense of a CPA protecting a client when there is fraud/crime. The whole nature of why someone seeks a CPA is to stay within the boundaries of what is legal and anything contrary to that is defying which a CPA is morally obligated. When a CPA faces this situation I don’t think a CPA should be required to turn in a client but if that CPA turns out documents that are false, then that CPA assumes responsibly in a crime that is happening.
The most obvious weakness of both the Hobbesian and Lockean justifications for obedience is that we have never explicitly consented to be ruled by a state and obey its laws. This puts the legitimacy of the state at risk. You may argue that voting implies a tacit consent to be governed, as voting is voluntary it would seem that those who vote would be accepting the authority. You could also argue that there is no need for proof of consent and that it is enough to have hypothetical consent as it may be enough that consent would be rational. This is the most likely as Hobbes justifies the state by explaining that as humans are by nature are selfish, unsocial creatures driven by two needs: survival and personal pleasure.
However, a person cannot be charged for violating the H.R 347 law unless the government proves that these people were fully aware of being disorderly and/or being near any restricted building or ground. Therefore, this means that individuals unaware of blocking the entrance of a restricted building or even if they just didn’t know they were nearby such building cannot be charged for this crime. Also, the violation of this law will require one to commit “disorderly or disruptive conduct [that] in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions.” Freedom of speech gives people the right to express themselves. However, a person can express their opinion without intentionally meaning to interfere with the government. Choosing to express their opinion by purposely showing disruptive conduct does not concur with the First
So my thought is why is it that if there is no oversight/order then why do individuals lose sight of what is right and wrong. 3. What questions do you have about this research that are still unanswered? It’s clear that without order there will be chaos, but at some point there was once order. My question would then be why would a person or persons in charge decide not to continue to enforce order and let individuals be free to produce such violent acts.
For instance, in Nigeria, the average duration was as long as 3.7 years (“Socioeconomic impact” 10). In many countries, the conditions of the pre-trial detention are no different from prisons including tortures. Keeping suspects who are presumed to be innocent in these conditions is violating the suspect’s rights. In Brazil, there are many detainees who should not be imprisoned, but kept in the jail for several months before their trials(“Conectas
If the government does not protect the right to speech then individuals would constantly be sensoring ideas and thus, prohibiting discussions. When a government entity decides to restrict a form of speech based on its content then a first amendment violation occurs. Speech that has sexist, homophobic, or racist content can’t just be prohibited because that would prevent someone else from expressing their opinions and beliefs. Professor Chemerinsky reestated the fact that speech can’t simply be banned because it is offensive to some individuals. However, Professor Chemerinsky also acknowledged that not all speech
An interesting study from the FBI uniformed crime reports from 2006 to 2010 shows 54% of rapes/sexual assaults go unreported. 3% of those reported actually serve time in jail. In the same study done by the FBI, out of every 100 rapes, 46 get reported, 12 lead to arrests, 9 get prosecuted, 5 lead to felony convictions, and 3 will spend even a day in jail. (1) Surgical castration is any action, surgical, chemical, or otherwise by which a male loses the functions of the testicles or a female loses the functions of the ovaries. Chemical castration is the administration of medication designed to reduce the libido and sexual activity.