You might decide a few key elements of the pro-life decisions are worthwhile, such as preserving the safety of the mother and unborn child. Your religion could also take precedence over abortions. As for myself I am undecided. Personally if I had to make the decision to keep a child that I created unintentionally I would fight for pro-life, and love the child unconditionally. Although if I were to be asked by a friend or a random person what choice should be made I would have to consider their situation.
Pro-Protective Custody Laws Position For: A fetus is a life, a person, and most importantly a future child. It is our job as a society to ensure that he or she is protected. When this woman chose to carry this child, she in fact gave up her right to control her own body, and make choices only for her well-being. In the hunt for justice, we must make the fetus’s rights just as important as the mother’s. If a woman chooses not to seek medical attention for her unborn child, is that not the same as a mother not seeking medical attention for her baby’s aliment?
If they are going to make that decision to have sex, they are making the decision to accept the consequences of that choice. When an embryo is fertilized it is alive and forming into a baby, therefore, what right do we have to destroy that if we were irresponsible? And, even if you didn’t want that infant you created because of irresponsible actions, there is still the option of adoption or birth control. Even the Constitution can back up pro-life views of abortion. If you look at the constitution, it says people have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The final decision could be influenced by whether Sam and Marion would regard abortion as ethically acceptable if the baby were found to carry the Huntington's gene. Some people take a principled position that the unborn child has a right to life and that the parents are ethically wrong to choose abortion. Others take a utilitarian approach and consider that although abortion is always bad there are some
Thomson explains that the fetus is a person who has the right to life. However, when the mother’s life is at risk, the idea of abortion can be considered morally permissible. In this scenario abortion is permissible due to the fact that we all have the right to protect our lives from any danger. This is what we call self-defense. Nevertheless, this is not the right term to justify this action, since there is no valid self-defense against someone who is innocent and unwilling to cause any harm.
In regards to the donated embryos, they should not have been conceived for the sole purpose of scientific research and the parents of embryos that are used in research should know that they are being used for that reason. I am not for or against abortion as a whole, but I do think that they should be legal and available in specific situations. Babies born as a result of rape or incest could most likely be neglected or be born with birth defects due to inbreeding. I know that the arguments of both sides of these issues will continue for years to come but I hope that soon people will realize that there are ways to compromise but not negotiate their personal
Pro Choice A topic that is very controversial in today’s American society is whether or not abortions and stem cell research should be legal or not. There are more facts that prove these topics should be legal. The 9th Amendment states the American’s right of pro choice. Abortion should be kept legal because there are many reasons why the mother should not have the baby. Also because abortions are legal then stem cell research should be made legal because if a fetus is already killed then it can still be put to good scientific research and possibly help another human being.
Women who chose to have control over their bodies should then exercise proper contraceptive practices or also partake in abstinence. The idealogical stance being that if you are not able or willing to support a child, then refraining from having sexual intercourse is absolutely necessary. Abstinence is the only way to completely prevent the need for abortion. Again, the abortion process is damaging psychologically and physically. Instead
Comprehensive Sexual Education vs. Abstinence-Only Sexual Education has become one of America’s most debatable subjects between people. Right wing conservatives argue that schools should only teach abstinence-only programs, while social liberals argue that American schools should teach comprehensive programs that promote abstinence. Abstinence-only programs only discuss the narrow topic of abstaining from sex usually until marriage because it will avoid the risk of pregnancy, STDs, and later on will benefit the sexual bond with one’s ultimate partner. Now abstinence may be the best overall choice but that certainly does not mean teens are going to abstain because of this. The problem with abstinence only programs is that they do not teach
In this landmark case, the Court ruled that a pregnancy may be aborted during the first trimester, because the embryo is not yet viable. During the second trimester, the state may decide to protect the woman’s health by regulating the manner in which the abortion occurs. However, the Court ruled that during the third trimester, the developing child is capable of surviving on its own and, therefore; the state then has the power to deny the woman an abortion. After this ruling many pro-choice individuals argued that it was an inappropriate intrusion of the government into the people’s affairs; but as a result many young lives were saved. Abortion is unnecessary and the statistics prove it.