Political Parties Rise In America

1374 Words6 Pages
Political Parties Rise in America In light of the struggle over the ratification of the Constitution, political factions began to form in the new nation of the United States. Two dominant groups arose, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were usually of the wealthy class, and were in support of the Constitution and the proposed federal government. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were the opposite. They were made up of mostly common people who supported state’s rights and small government. They demanded a Bill of Rights in the Constitution. The Constitution was of course ratified, but the political tension did not end there. Although political parties were not evident during the Washington Administration,…show more content…
In an effort to avoid a possible war with Britain, Washington sent Supreme Court Chief Justice John Jay to Great Britain to negotiate. The verdict was that the British promised to evacuate outposts on United States soil (not likely) and pay for damages for seized American vessels, with no promise to stop future seizures. In exchange, the United States had to pay back Revolutionary War debts and abide by Great Britain’s restrictive trading policies toward France. The treaty was not extremely popular, but for the Federalists it was an opportunity to create a better relationship with Britain. For the Democratic-Republicans, it was more like surrender to Britain and a betrayal of the South, who would have to pay a major share of the war debt while wealthy Federalist shippers were being…show more content…
The acts were passed by a Federalist Congress in 1798. The Alien Laws raised the residency requirements for citizenship to fourteen years and granted the president power to deport foreigners considered “dangerous” even in times of peace. This violated the customary open door hospitality of the United States. The Sedition Act made anyone convicted of defaming government officials or policies liable to imprisonment. It gained a great deal of criticism from the Democratic-Republicans. The two factions took a strong defense to whether the Sedition Act was justifiable by the Constitution or not. Federalist Congressman Allen defended the Sedition Act by condemning Americans for their acts of libel and “most shameless falsehoods against the representatives of the people.” Allen stated that “freedom of the press and opinions was never understood to give the right of publishing falsehoods and slanders, nor of exciting sedition, insurrection, and slaughter…” (Doc. 6). A Democratic-Republican supporter George Hay of Philadelphia argued that any kind of legislation against a protected freedom, in this case freedom of the press and opinion, is “extremely forbidden by the constitution” (Doc. 7). Democrat-Republicans Thomas Jefferson and James Madison quietly rebelled against the Alien and Sedition Acts by drafting the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. They argued that the
Open Document