Police Perjury: a Tangled Web of Lies Under Oath

1140 Words5 Pages
Thomas A. Diemer CRM-350-CL02 December 5, 2010 WORD COUNT = 1109 Police Perjury: A Tangled Web of Lies Under Oath “Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth,” the oath that every witness agrees to comply with prior to speaking in a court of law. It is the rule of engagement, the most basic principle of the judicial system’s search for the truth. This Oath takes on greater significance when the witness is a police officer and he or she is “testi-lying” instead of testifying. Police officers are the most visible representatives of the government and the criminal justice system. They symbolize the rule of law. The loss of police credibility in such a public forum diminishes law enforcement's effectiveness in the streets. (Cliffnotes 2010) The O.J. Simpson acquittal is an example of how distrust of the police can result in a jury discounting a ”mountain” of evidence against a defendant. Criminal Justice scholars and investigative commissions have documented police lying under oath. (Cliffnotes 2010) The most well known is the 1994 Mollen Commission Report. (Cliffnotes 2010) This commission was charged with reviewing reports of police corruption in the New York Police Department. (Slobogin 1996) The Mollen Commission found that police perjury was an epidemic. (Slobogin 1996) The study showed that good cops lie the most because they honestly believe a guilty defendant will go free. (Slobogin 1996) It is commonly referred to as the “noble lie”. (Cliffnotes 2010) The deception presented in two forms: direct untruths about something and/or omissions where case harming details are left out or forgotten. Police officers are trained on how to give testimony. They are professional, persuasive witnesses. (Cliffnotes 2010) So when a police officer testifies untruthfully that he or she saw the defendant drop

More about Police Perjury: a Tangled Web of Lies Under Oath

Open Document