The Due Process model would say that it is needed to make sure that officers properly follow procedures while questioning or detaining suspect on the street, in the case that something gets out of hand, a jury can see what actually happened. Although, supporters of the Crime Control model say that there shouldn’t be a need for expensive cameras to record everything an officer does, because they should place their faith in the police to uphold the law at their discretion. Advocates of both sides would agree that justice is the
While this law does not have any jurisdiction in a civil or grand jury case, it does prevent police officers from taking action that would violate Americans’ fourth Amendment right and deter any misconduct on behalf of the police officer. The exclusionary rule was designed to prevent police officers from using evidence that would otherwise convict those who actively participate in criminal activity. There are pros and cons in every situation when it involves police behavior and criminal activity. There are five issues that come to mind in determining whether or not the exclusionary rule should be abolished: Police misconduct, who is being punished, who is guilty, ways to protect those whom are wrongfully searched, and judicial integrity (Landmark Cases, 2005). Police officers are expected to enforce the laws of their community without bias and to act within a higher standard than the average citizen.
It is usually recommended that any career use honesty as a quality, but it is extremely important that criminal justice professionals have honesty as well. Law enforcement is occasionally known for being corrupt, and it is so important for our law enforcement officers to be truthful on all applications, reports, and everyday work. This provides for more efficient and trustworthy public servants. The most important reason for honesty is simply to ensure that the innocent stay that way and are not caught in the lies of the accusers. Criminal justice professionals play an important role in the court system, and if they lie on accusations and evidence, the innocent become victims of the dishonesty.
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and Code of Practice are the main laws that have been produced to try to protect the rights of people, for the public to feel safe and the police to have a guideline.. But some people think that they infringe on human rights to go about their business and their right to privacy. Lawful arrest and detention are two of the police actions that are covered in PACE and are regulations that police must follow . They are there to protect the people who have been arrested and detained. The Act also benefits the police because if they follow the rules, they will not get any complaints against them which they could be disciplined .
No. But this does not stop people from doing what they feel is necessary and breaking the laws. What type of person commits police brutality and why does it happen? Well, police brutality is done by a few rogue cops or bad apples. Or it can be police officers whom like to inflict pain to those because of their feelings on the issue.
Ethnicity and the Police A police officer’s duty is to uphold the law, ensure safety of the citizens and property, and prevent crime. The oath that a police officer takes in the beginning of their career is to make a promise to protect and serve communities. It covers all American citizens no matter what the color of their skin or their gender. Although it is a police officer’s duty to protect citizens and prevent crime, there have been problems going on with police officers like corruption and racial profiling. Everyone would like to think that police officers are all good and upstanding citizens in order to serve and protect, but there are corrupt police officers everywhere.
In line with this, the investigative department requests warrants to search for evidence, but they must be approved by the judicial branch. (Lynch, 1998) Most defenses that invoke the exclusionary rule are based on the lack of or improper application of search warrants. Those that support the continued use of the exclusionary rule argue that there must be this line between the police officers that are often emotionally involved in a case, and an impartial third party that can objectively review the evidence. Without this safeguard, citizens would have little protection from overzealous police officers who could search their homes and persons with almost anything serving as probable cause in their opinion. The fact that officers know that illegally obtained (but true) evidence will quite possibly be thrown out, and therefore dangerous criminals will be freed, will encourage them to follow the proper procedures.
All states and the federal government have laws establishing victims’ rights. As a matter of fact, victims’ rights should not be placed on the back burner because there is a language barrier. Criminal justice administrators are always looking for creative and cost effective ways to deal with language barriers that derive from serving a multicultural population. Victims’ rights usually apply to victims of felonies which are the more serious crimes. However, some states also grant rights to victims of misdemeanors.
I personally am a strong believer that an “ideal society” should have no guns; nevertheless crime is a big problem to the citizens of our society and guns are necessary. Therefore, it is not recommended that we ban guns completely. The most pragmatic thing to do is to reduce the availability of guns and make it difficult to procure them by making sure that they are given only to people who are mentally capable of handling them. There is a definite need to ban guns since their liberal usage leads to large-scale public massacres, which are suited for the field of war, not civilized society. Weapons like automatic rifles and assault weapons are tools created with the purpose of mass killings.
Take away the little details that make us who we are, and we are ALL the same. Just human beings. I would not give up life, liberty, and security rights, because I believe that everyone has the right to live and feel comfortable and safe. Police officers help with this because they enforce rules, and arrest people which keeps us safe from some danger. One thing about police officers though, is that i believe they shouldn’t be allowed to come up to you and check you, unless if they have a reason.