In Mel Gibson’s version of Hamlet, Hamlet’s acting is outstanding because while watching the play we can see the effort and talent Gibson has put in the movie. Gibson knows what his lines are and he exactly knows what his actions are. His acting is so natural because while he was acting the audience can feel the pain he is suffering through. Another difference in both versions of the movie is; in Kenneth’s version it does not seem that the play is acted in the theatre, but it is done by professionals. Kenneth’s version is filmed as Hamlet family is very royal and rich; also the house is a mansion.
110 in the Shade; “a Hot Production” Trinity’s Department of Theatre Arts director, Mr. William Bradford, fabricated a colorful revival of 110 in the Shade. This homey musical buckled under the weight of the endless talent possessed by the actors in this production. The Trinity rendition of 110 in the Shade threatened to burst through the seams of this underwhelming show, with absolute overwhelming talent. This production consists of a simplistic story line, but was built upon by the superb cast involved in this exceptional production. Every cast member possessed a strong stature in the show.
This one in particular was my favorite because of the catchy tune and the lyrical significance. I found the satirical overtone of the whole tune to really signify the problems in the past and often current society. As well, the song was one of those melodies that sticks in your head all day, but not the annoying kind. This kept the tune ‘catchy’ and helped the audience effectively pay attention to the message. The song talks about how the actors have hit it big time on Broadway with their performance of “Pretty Lady”.
I have to say that it was something very different from what I had ever seen before, and I could tell it was the same for the people I went with because they were also very surprised of what we were watching and experiencing. After reading the dramaturg I tried to keep an open mind and tried to understand the theme of the play. The
I like to see props so that the characters can stay engaged in what is going on. The costumes were very traditional and plain in all black with a hint of pink or purple. I did not like attire only because it was too plain. But, I understand why it was done because the actors were portraying different people and costume change would have been too
That was amazing. For the most part, the acting was very good. Each actor / actress was very good with their characters, and there were only minimal mistakes. One of the biggest mistakes I saw was when Andrews character entered the room in Act two and his hat got knocked off. Instead of just picking it up like a normal person would, he broke character and looked worried for a second, then waited to pick it up.
During the Elizabethan era, The Globe Theater was the place where many different people could get together and be entertained for an afternoon. The architecture of the theater influenced how plays were performed while the props added to the professionalism of the plays being produced. The actors were the most important piece of the theater since without them; the theater would not have flourished as much. The architecture, props, and actors were all essential necessities that contributed to The Globe Theater’s success. The Globe Theater was built in 1599, in the Southwark district of London.
Everyone was nicely dressed and the workers were extremely helpful in directing the audience to the correct place. The doors were not allowed to be opened during performances which kept the distractions to a minimum. Out of all the songs, my favorite piece was Lago de Lagrimas. As explained by
William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream The stage production of William Arden Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, by a British director Tim Supple was one in a million-that everyone talked about it and questions rode questions, on how the performance went. ‘It is the best production I have ever seen. What grapples me most, is the cast, ravaging with a rich choreography’, this was said by the British Ambassador to India in a chat with Times of India. The almighty dramatist play was sponsored for production by the British Council, India. Staged at Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, on Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi, on the 3 of March, the old, but became-new play was performed by what Mr. Supple described as ‘an all Indian and Sri Lankan cast’, spoken in many languages, from English to Hindi and Bengali.
The worlds and events portrayed in romantic plays were perfect, surreal and beautiful. The characters in romantic literary works were always extreme, either completely good or completely bad. Some of the biggest differences between realism and romanticism are the themes and ideas in each. In romanticism, the focus was generally placed upon idealistic views of life, and no matter how thrilling the work was, it would always have a happy ending. In realism, the playwrights tried to be as objective as possible whilst focusing on the mundane issues in everyday life, such as politics and economics or, with playwrights like Henrik Ibsen, the role of women in society.