Plaintiff V Arizona Case Study

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States of America, Plaintiff v. Samantha Clark Defendant and Appellant.

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Case No. 123 D.F. 456)

BRIEF FOR THE APPELLANT

[Attorney’s name, bar number, address and telephone number] Attorney for Appellant

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF AUTHORITES ....................................................................... 3 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ............................................................ 4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE................................................................... 4 STATEMENT OF FACTS .........................................................................…show more content…
Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1978). ............................................ 13 Morgan v. United States, 309 F.2d 234, 237 (D.C. Cir. 1962) ...................... 8 People v. Belge, 83 Misc. 2d 186 (N.Y. County Ct. 1975) ......................... 14 People v. Collie, 30 Cal. 3d 43 (1981)....................................................... 13 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980) ................... 13 State v. Kociolek, 23 N.J. 400 (1957)........................................................ 14 United States ex. Rel. Bell v. Brierton, No. 75 C 4315 (1979) .................... 12 United States v. Erhardt, 381 F.2d (1967) ................................................. 11 United States v. Levin, 133 F. Supp. 88 (D.Colo.1953), ............................. 10 United States v. Masterpol, 940 F.2d (1991).............................................. 11 United States v. Wood, 6 F.3d (2012) ....................................................... 11 Statutes 18 U.S.C. §1001 (2006)....................................................................... 3, 4, 5 28 U.S.C. §1291 (2006).............................................................................. 3 Constitutional Provisions US Const., amend V................................................................................. 14 US Const., amend VI ...............................................................................…show more content…
DATED:

[ ] Respectfully submitted, By: [Attorney’s signature] Attorney for Appellant

17

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to ARCAP 14, I certify that the attached brief __X__ Uses proportionately spaced type of 14 points or more, is doublespaced using a roman font and contains 2,548 words or _____ Uses monospaced type of no more than 10.5 characters per inch and _____ Does not exceed 40 pages (opening and answering briefs) or 20 pages (reply briefs).

____________________________________________________ Date Signature of Attorney or Unrepresented Party

18

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Bonne Mullen, certify that on October 26, 2014, two copies of Appellant’s foregoing Answering Brief were sent via U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid, addressed to the following: Richard R. Thomas, Esq. Michael A. Schern, Esq. 1640 South Stapley Drive, Suite 205 Mesa, Arizona 85204 Counsel For Appellee DATED this 26th day of October, 2014

.

By: __________________________ Bonne Mullen Attorney for Appellant