There should also be an increased use of ADR in courts those tribunals for civil cases. ADR is a great way to solve civil cases not everyone has the money to go court so ADR is an option in civil cases. A problem that may affect the access of the legal system is the strict rules of evidence resulting in useful evidence being inadmissible. Evidence such as stolen evidence cannot be used in court it could be very useful in get to the bottom of a case but it inadmissible because it was stolen. There are also difficulties with witnesses giving evidence.
The courtroom is not the only time in which lawyers use questioning, outside of this they are involved with interviews, depositions and witness rehearsals, all contextually different scenarios where questioning is implemented by lawyers. Within the trial itself, questions are asked in episodes of both direct-examination and cross-examination, the variable of which side the lawyer represents is also a factor. The use of questioning in this field is extremely complicated, more so than other occupations. It varies on the basis of each role, episode and in proceedings both within the courtroom and out. No single manner and style of questioning is used in this
The examples provided in the text illustrate just how easy it is to be redundant and not realize it. For example, phrases such as “absolutely essential “or “a total of 68 participants” are errors regularly committed on my part. Being able to identify redundancy will be a focus as I work towards more clear and concise writing. As a commitment to reducing bias in writing, the rule I will remember is “recognizing that differences should be mentioned only when relevant” (p. 71). I did not realize how easy it is to unintentionally use bias language.
It is important that the people I communicate with can reach me in a range of different ways and that I am competent at using these methods- for example accessing secure email accounts, using the in surgery telephone and fax machine and of course face to face contact that is comfortable and open. Barriers and challenges There can sometimes be barriers in communication that are easily solved, such as language barriers, if this is the case, a translator can be provided. Here at our organisation we use a telephone translator- so that no prior arrangements need to be made if an individual needs to be seen urgently. But other barriers can be less
Occasional minor errors in grammar and mechanics do not interfere significantly with the reading experience. Sentences communicate ideas clearly but could, at times, be more concise, precise, or varied in structure. Minor lapses in word choice and tone. | Clear, fluid prose with minimal errors in grammar and mechanics. Sentences are varied in structure and communicate ideas efficiently and effectively.
English law has often been criticised for not being codified unlike other countries. In fact, within developed western society, only Israel has a similar constitution to our own. A Bill of Rights would ensure that all provisions are contained in a single document, making the law more accessible and avoid confusion. It is also beneficial to have what is considered to be lawful set out in a clear and concise manner. If a Bill of Rights were to be created, there would be an agreement of all terms and their meanings whilst in the drafting stages.
Still, this only applies in certain circumstances, and the majority of lay people will contact Solicitors rather than Barristers. Solicitors must be able to create good working relationships with the full spectrum of personalities that may become their clients, explaining points of law, and legal process, in a clear accessible manner. Each person is different and solicitors need to foster good interaction so that a client understands the options present and is able to give sensible instruction. Of paramount importance to a Barrister, however, is advocacy, and courtroom advocacy in particular. They must excel at presenting legal arguments in a persuasive manner, to attract the support of judges and juries.
Law & Popular Culture Can the Lex Populi increase access to the Legal System? There exists much argument in the legal profession that the Lex Populi, or law in popular culture, serves no purpose other then that of entertainment. Modern depictions of lawyers, the courtroom, judges and the legal system are criticised because they have little substantial value and are an inaccurate portrayal of the law in action. This paper considers that argument and examines the way in which law in popular culture can have a positive effect on increasing the lay man’s access to the legal system. Discussion centres around concepts of the lawyer as a translator, how the Lex Populi diminishes the value of the legal system because of its inaccuracies, the positives of law being depicted in popular culture and the role of the media and its influence on access to the legal system.
These methods can be less costly to the client. According to Cheeseman (2010), the chart below will contrast the two litigations: Nontraditional Litigation | Traditional Litigation | Mediation-simplest
In other words, you could go to these countries and learn their languages, but they can’t really teach you the English language like natives speakers. Also, it is much easier to learn any language for the native speakers. The daily communication with a native speaker will help you automatically to be fluent and master the language easier. For this reason the place plays a very important rule in learning a new language. Moreover, besides the importance of the place, mastering any language learn on the people.