Open Roads Peter van Inwagen thinks a compatibilists position is confusing, considering that it should be reason and logic how “choices” of an individual will determine free will and how it is that they define free will and a physically possible choice may determine an outcome. It is not clear when free will and determinism are compatible. For this, Inwagen demonstrates two views to understand and clear the confusion about compatibilist position. He says the easiest view to understand is the first one that gives a clear idea about futures that do not have a physically possible connection with the present are “open” to and individual. Second view is more difficult because compatibilist talk about reasonable futures.
Simpler questions would be “Is Dr. Smith’s intentional practise of omitting important information relevant to his client’s treatment ethical?” or “Is Dr. Smith’s failure to report his client’s actions to the authorities morally justifiable?” Both would be good questions, but I believe the question the study guide asks us to consider embrace both of these questions. The possible answers to the question are “yes” or “no”. I will be using rule-based utilitarianism and Kantian deontology to analyse this case study. There is not enough information to consider act-based utilitarianism: Act-based utilitarianism essentially says that one should perform that act which will bring about the greatest amount of good (“happiness”) over bad for everyone affected by the act. Each situation and each person must be assessed on their own merits (Thiroux, 2004, p. 42).
The risk management plan should include the following Risk Identification: This is the first step in risk analysis. KFF needs to identify risks associated with the implementation of chosen strategy. Some of the risks are poor planning, insufficient resources, lack of management commitment. Alternatives Analysis: A risk analysis is not sound if other risks alternatives are not explored. Alternatives may include the implementation of an effective strategic plan and developing a planning system/ Contingencies Poor Planning: KFF will need to make use of any of the implementation software for effective planning.
A. Is there a flaw in the consideration of the contract that would allow Giant to stop honoring the contract and allow it to buy from another vendor? II. Under agreed considerations on are current terms satisfactory to terminate agreement? A.
(policy & procedure) what is the end state of the problem/discourse? what is the rhetor’s purpose/agenda about the issue? Constraints pose a problem with the rhetorical objectives. That is other people opposed to what they want to do or how to solve a
Grant proposals put the needs and services that the program addresses. “Needs assessment is usually the first step of any planning and grant writing efforts. There are both qualitative and quantitative ways to identify, understand, and express the needs that are targeted by the planning and evaluation tasks,” (Yuen, 2003,
Joe could lose his job and even worse he could put the company in place for a lawsuit. The ethical theory that supports how I think Joe should respond to this invitation is the utilitarianism theory. This approach states that a decision that maximizes the ratio of good over evil for all those concerned is the ethical course, (McAdams, Neslund, & Neslund, 2007). The utilitarianism theory should be used because Joe should think which action he should take that would benefit the most involved. If he goes on the trip it is only good for Bill.
Make recommendations Performance objective Make recommendations to improve the performance of an operational plan. Assessment description This assessment requires learners to identify areas of non-performance in an operational plan and make recommendations to improve performance. Procedure 1. Using the information provided in Appendix 1 identify three areas of non-performance. 2.
1._____ proceeds from an oral warning to a written warning to a suspension to dismissal. • Positive discipline • Progressive discipline • Procedural justice • Due process 2. Which question should not be important in evaluating the value of training? • Was the cost of training within the budget? • Did change occur?
For this paper, you would explain the problem and provide some background on why this problem exists. If the cause is unknown, then you could speculate as to the origin of the issue/problem (consider some of what was discussed in Appendix A). You would discuss what team member conflict is and how too much conflict might be detrimental to your chosen organization (e.g., too much time and money wasted, job satisfaction is low). In essence, why should the organization be concerned about this issue? You need to show how a concept from class (e.g., team conflict) applies to the organization’s situation.