Photorealism Essay

1547 Words7 Pages
The 1960s was full of controversy in the art world. Minimalism and Pop Art paved the way for Photorealism by challenging people to consider pieces like Kasimir Malevitch’s “Black Cross” (1915) as true art. Some have described Photorealism as a reaction to Minimalism. In 1992, Vivien Raynor wrote in the “New York Times” that Photorealism “came out of Pop yet had the affectlessness of Minimalism and, at the same time, capitalized on the public's fondness for exact replication.”

Photorealists began with the camera as a device for recording the naked truth of their subject matter on film. Then they used a technical, if not scientific, methodology for painting the image captured on film. Observers could then react to the pure truth produced in the systematic process. Thomas Albright, an art critic for the “San Francisco Chronicle,” once said that “intervention between the painting and objects served to neutralize the original subject of the picture.”

This art movement continued into the 1970s at its peak, and some artists continued the approach for the next few decades. Photorealism was international, not just limited to American artists. The leader of Photorealism in the 1960s was Richard Estes (b. 1932). He graduated from the Art Institute of Chicago in 1956 and relocated to the art world in New York City. Estes would always use the camera to create images that would be useful for his representational paintings.

Early on, Estes specialized in urban landscapes and had solo exhibitions with this title. Later, he turned to European subjects and sea landscapes. In 1967’s “Figures in Cafeteria,” Estes reflected the influence of Impressionism in the artistic rendering of indoor light and the clothing details of the cafeteria diners. The total effect is a moment captured in time with a reassuring sense of motion.

Some art historians describe New Image painting
Open Document